Is This King Tut’s Mum’s Mummy, The Famous Queen Nefertiti?

Last Friday 19 February at 9pm on Channel 5, there was a great documentary called: King Tut’s Tomb: The Hidden Chamber.

Its exciting to see people making new discoveries, as in this case, with this most interesting part in this film, the fact that archaeologists identified a mummy corpse by DNA to be Tutankhamun’s mother, and some believe this body is now in the university of Bristol, UK.

                          

It was interesting to watch and see how no one knows why or how the most famous mysterious pharaoh Tutankhamun died.

And do not in anyway connect the famous pharaoh with the famous Exodus.

Tutanhkamun innermost coffin

Author Jon Bodsworth

http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/html/cairo_museum_52.html

 Yet it was amazing to hear how they confirm Tutankhamun died unexpectedly.

His famous mask was not made for him, but was originally for Nefertiti.

The burial chamber was not made for a pharaoh like Tutankhamun, but made for a female, and rushed in a hurry.

The furniture consisted of Nefertiti’s.

DNA test prove the famous pharaoh Akhenaten, is the father of Tutankhamun.

And we already know Akhenaten left his old city to build a new city at Amarna, where he tried to change the whole religion of Egypt, to the monotheistic worship of a new form of the sun god.

Now what made Akhenaten change is faith, from many gods to one God?

What made Akhenaten officially change his name from Amenhotep IV, just a month before he left his old city?

Are some of you thinking what I am?

Could the famous pharaoh Akhenaten, be the actual pharaoh in the famous story of Exodus 5:1?

1 Afterward Moses and Aaron went to Pharaoh and said, “This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: ‘Let my people go, so that they may hold a festival to me in the wilderness.’ ”

2 Pharaoh said, “Who is the Lord, that I should obey him and let Israel go? I do not know the Lord and I will not let Israel go.” NIV.

Many scholars say it is impossible for Akhenaten be the pharaoh of Exodus 5, as the timing is wrong.

However from my own research over the years, there are striking similarities with the famous story of the Exodus, and the pharaoh Akhenaten, and his wife Nefertiti, and their son Tutankhamun.

And Akhenaten did live in the late Eighteenth Dynasty,

Many believers believe Tutankhamun was the first-born son to die in: The Plague on the Firstborn, Exodus 11:4.

4 So Moses said, “This is what the Lord says: ‘About midnight I will go throughout Egypt. 5 Every firstborn son in Egypt will die, from the firstborn son of Pharaoh, who sits on the throne,

Wooden bust of the boy king, found in his tomb.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AMannequin_of_Tutankhamun.jpg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0f/Mannequin_of_Tutankhamun.jpg

By Jon Bodsworth [Copyrighted free use], via Wikimedia Commons

Tutankhamun or king tut was the first-born son of the pharaoh Akhenaten, so that part adds up.

And this seems to add up with why archaeologists cannot understand how or why the young 19-year-old boy king Tutankhamun suddenly died.

And seems to make sense to why Tutankhamun was mummified in a rush.

And buried in a burial chamber not made for himself.

It also makes sense to why Akhenaten left his home.

Was Akhenaten the actual pharaoh of Exodus, who watched the river turn to blood, and his city be destroyed by fire, and his land became without light and in complete ruin. As he watched miserably the groaning throughout his land, while his slaves carried away his jewellery around their necks, and he sat helplessly looking at his dead people everywhere.

It certainly seems to make sense to why Akhenaten rejected his gods, which did nothing but sleep, after watching the only true God of Israel, defeat his false and useless Gods by drowning His whole army in the red sea, in front of his very eyes.

This would explain perfectly, why Akhenaten so desperately changed his name, and obviously wanted to run as far away as possible, bury his head in new sand, and drowned his sorrows, and build a new life and city and copy Israel who had only ONE almighty God.

I would like to hear what you know about this. 

Could the famous pharaoh Akhenaten, be the actual pharaoh in the famous story of Exodus 5:1?

You decide.

Thank you for reading my research.

I will leave you with some related archaeological finds.

May you be blessed.

Simon Brown.

IPUWER PAPYRUS The Ten Plagues of Egypt.. 

After being translated it was found to tell the same story as told in the Book of Exodus 7:19.

Papyrus

This ancient text reveals a dramatic story of, the river is blood, and destruction of fire, the land is without light and in ruin. There is groaning throughout the land, the slaves carry away the jewellery around their necks, there are dead people everywhere.

An amazing discovery was made in the 19th century called the IPUWER PAPYRUS. It was discovered in Egypt and dates back to the end of the middle kingdom. After being translated it was found to tell the same story as told in the Book of Exodus 7:19. Which describe the ten plagues of Egypt. It was written by a person who witnessed the scene's them self's, and was an Egyptian named Ipuwer. SB.

Amarna letters.

[[File:Amarna Akkadian letter.png|thumb|EA 161, letter by Aziru, leader of Amurru (stating his case to pharaoh), one of the Amarna letters in cuneiform writing on a clay tablet.]]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amarna_Akkadian_letter.png#/media/File:Amarna_Akkadian_letter.png

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Amarna letters (sometimes referred to as the Amarna correspondence or Amarna tablets) are an archive, written on clay tablets, primarily consisting of diplomatic correspondence between the Egyptian administration and its representatives in Canaan and Amurru during the New Kingdom. The letters were found in Upper Egypt at Amarna, the modern name for the Egyptian capital of Akhetaten (el-Amarna), founded by pharaoh Akhenaten (1350s – 1330s BC) during the Eighteenth dynasty of Egypt. The Amarna letters are unusual in Egyptological research, because they are mostly written in Akkadian cuneiform, the writing system of ancient Mesopotamia, rather than that of ancient Egypt. The known tablets total 382: 24 tablets had been recovered since the Norwegian Assyriologist Jørgen Alexander Knudtzon's landmark edition of the Amarna letters, Die El-Amarna-Tafel, published in two volumes (1907 and 1915).[1] The written correspondence spans a period of at most thirty years.

The Amarna letters are of great significance for biblical studies as well as Semitic linguistics, since they shed light on the culture and language of the Canaanite peoples in pre-biblical times. The letters, though written in Akkadian, are heavily colored by the mother tongue of their writers, who spoke an early form of Canaanite, the language family which would later evolve into its daughter languages, Hebrew and Phoenician. These "Canaanisms" provide valuable insights into the proto-stage of those languages several centuries prior to their first actual manifestation.[2][3] Full article here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amarna_letters