TACITUS ON CHRIST
A ROMAN HISTORIAN OUTSIDE THE BIBLE CONFIRMS THE EXECUTION OF JESUS CHRIST
By Simon Brown
One of the most fascinating pieces of historical evidence concerning Jesus Christ comes not from the Bible, not from an apostle, and not even from a Christian writer.
It comes from Tacitus, one of ancient Rome's most important historians.
Tacitus was a Roman senator and historian who wrote his Annals around AD 116. In Book 15, chapter 44, while describing the terrible fire that devastated Rome in AD 64, Tacitus records Emperor Nero's persecution of the Christians.
What makes his testimony so interesting is that Tacitus was certainly no friend of Christianity. His description of Christians is openly hostile. Yet in the process of attacking them, he preserves an extraordinary piece of historical information concerning Christ, Pontius Pilate, Tiberius, Judea and the early Christian movement.
WHAT DID TACITUS SAY ABOUT CHRIST?
Tacitus explains that the Christians received their name from Christus — Christ.
More importantly, he says that Christus suffered the "extreme penalty" during the reign of Emperor Tiberius, at the hands of Pontius Pilate.
In other words, here we have a major Roman historian writing outside the New Testament who records several important facts that correspond with the New Testament account:
Christ existed.
He was executed.
His execution occurred during the reign of Tiberius.
Pontius Pilate was responsible for His execution.
The movement associated with Christ originated in Judea.
Christianity subsequently spread as far as Rome.
Christians were present in Rome during Nero's reign.
This is precisely why the Tacitus passage has become so important in discussions concerning the historical Jesus.
THE GREAT FIRE OF ROME
The setting of Tacitus' account is the famous Great Fire of Rome, which devastated much of the city in July AD 64.
Tacitus reports that Nero blamed the Christians and subjected them to terrible punishments. He describes Christians being arrested and an enormous number subsequently being convicted.
This is remarkable because Christianity had begun in distant Judea only decades earlier, yet by the time of Nero it had already reached the very heart of the Roman Empire.
The evidence therefore does not merely concern Jesus.
It also tells us something about the extraordinary early spread of the Christian faith.
Scholars have noted that the passage supports the existence of a substantial Christian community in Rome by around AD 60 and shows that Roman pagans connected Christianity in Rome with its origins in Judea.
WAS THE TACITUS PASSAGE GENUINE?
This is an important question, and we should not simply ignore it.
The original handwritten copy produced by Tacitus himself has not survived. The oldest surviving manuscript containing this section of the Annals is the Second Medicean manuscript, copied centuries later.
There have therefore been arguments concerning whether Christians might have altered the passage.
However, the important point is that most modern scholars accept the Tacitus passage as authentic.
There have been minority challenges to this conclusion, including arguments that part of the reference to Christ could have been interpolated. Nevertheless, the suggestion that the Annals as a whole was forged has generally been rejected, and scholars such as John P. Meier have argued that there is no historical or archaeological evidence demonstrating that a later scribe inserted the passage.
There is another powerful reason why a Christian forgery is difficult to argue.
Tacitus does not sound like a Christian.
Far from writing sympathetically about Christianity, he uses extremely hostile language toward Christians. Scholars have therefore argued that this negative tone makes Christian authorship of the passage unlikely.
Why would a Christian fabricator invent a passage portraying his own faith in such insulting terms?
That certainly deserves consideration.
WHAT ABOUT "CHRISTIANS" AND "CHRESTIANS"?
There is another fascinating manuscript detail.
The earliest surviving manuscript has evidence of alteration in the spelling associated with Christians/Chrestians. Scholars have debated whether Tacitus originally wrote Chrestians, whether this was a scribal error, or whether the term reflected how ordinary Romans pronounced or referred to Christians.
Interestingly, scholars have noted that both forms were apparently used in antiquity.
This textual issue does not remove the central statement concerning Christus and His execution under Pontius Pilate.
TACITUS AND PONTIUS PILATE
There is also a small historical detail worth explaining.
Tacitus calls Pontius Pilate a procurator, whereas the famous archaeological Pilate Stone identifies Pilate as a prefect.
This has generated considerable scholarly discussion.
Some researchers believe Tacitus simply used the title that was more familiar in his own period when describing an official from an earlier generation. Others have proposed different explanations.
Whatever explanation is preferred, this does not change the central point:
Tacitus identifies Pontius Pilate as the Roman official responsible for the execution of Christ during the reign of Tiberius.
And that agrees with the central historical framework recorded in the New Testament.
AN IMPORTANT NON-CHRISTIAN WITNESS
This is what makes Tacitus particularly valuable.
If the only ancient references to Jesus came from Christians, a critic could simply say:
"Christians wrote those things because they already believed in Jesus."
But Tacitus cannot easily be dismissed that way.
He was a Roman historian, and his attitude toward Christianity was plainly hostile.
Yet he still records Christus, His execution under Pontius Pilate, during Tiberius' reign, and the subsequent spread of the Christian movement from Judea to Rome.
That does not prove every theological claim Christianity makes, nor does Tacitus claim to have witnessed Jesus personally. His own source for the information about Christ is not identified, which scholars continue to discuss.
But as historical evidence for the basic existence and execution of Jesus, Tacitus is extremely important.
Indeed, historians cited in the material supplied for this article regard Tacitus as an important independent Roman witness, and scholars such as Bart Ehrman have argued that his account confirms the basic historical conclusion that Jesus was executed under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius.
THE QUESTION THAT STARTED MY RESEARCH
Interestingly, I originally began looking into Tacitus after receiving a challenge from an atheist.
The challenge was essentially this:
If Tacitus was such a careful historian, why didn't he record the extraordinary supernatural events described in connection with Jesus' death?
That question encouraged me to investigate Tacitus for myself.
But while Tacitus does not provide an account of those supernatural events, I discovered something else extremely interesting:
Tacitus actually provides an important non-Christian historical reference to Christ Himself.
And that distinction matters.
We should never claim that Tacitus proves things he did not write about.
He does not independently verify the resurrection.
He does not describe the miracles of Jesus.
He does not independently confirm every event recorded in the Gospels.
But what he does tell us is historically significant.
WHAT TACITUS DOES CONFIRM
Tacitus provides evidence from outside the Bible that there was a historical figure known as Christus, that this figure was executed under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius, that the movement associated with Him originated in Judea, and that within only a few decades His followers had spread all the way to Rome, where they suffered persecution under Nero.
That is remarkable testimony coming from a Roman historian who clearly had no interest in promoting Christianity.
ARCHAEOLOGY, MANUSCRIPTS AND HISTORY
This is why studying the historical background of the Bible is so fascinating.
The Bible did not emerge in some imaginary world.
It speaks about real rulers, real governors, real cities, real nations and real historical events.
Pontius Pilate has left archaeological evidence.
Roman emperors such as Tiberius and Nero are firmly established historical figures.
And now we find a major Roman historian writing about the execution of Christus under Pontius Pilate and the subsequent persecution of His followers.
Tacitus is also not alone. Other Roman writers, including Pliny the Younger and Suetonius, wrote about early Christians or events associated with them.
The more we investigate the world surrounding the New Testament, the more we discover that Christianity arose within a very real and identifiable historical setting.
FINAL CONCLUSION
Tacitus does not prove the entire Christian faith.
But neither can his testimony simply be brushed aside.
Here is a hostile Roman historian, writing outside the Bible, telling us that Christ was executed under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius, and that the movement originating from Him spread from Judea to Rome, where Christians were persecuted under Nero.
That is an extraordinary piece of historical evidence.
So don't simply take my word for it.
Research it. Examine the manuscripts. Read Tacitus. Consider the arguments for and against authenticity. Look at what historians themselves say.
And then decide where the evidence leads you.
As Jesus said:
"Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you."
Matthew 7:7 — BLB
I am Simon Brown.
SEEK — AND YOU WILL FIND.
RELATED ARTICLES
Wonderful Books on Biblical Archaeology – Discover the Evidence for the Bible.
The Astartu Relief – Bible Archaeology at Its Best.
Did Ancient Clay Tablets Preserve the Story of Noah's Flood?
Pontius Pilate's Roman Coins – Archaeological Evidence from the Time of Jesus
• The Lachish Letters Reveal the Divine Name of God
Has The Staff, or Rod of Moses been discovered?
• What Did Sir Isaac Newton Really Believe About God, Christ, and the Trinity?
• Josephus on Jesus – One of the Most Important Non-Biblical Witnesses
• Could These Bones Be Those of John the Baptist?
• The Discovery of the Great Stone of Mark 16:4
• The History, Evidence, and Resurrection of Jesus Christ
Josephus on Jesus – One of the Most Important Non-Biblical Witnesses.
Historicity of Jesus – The Historical Evidence for Jesus Christ
Evidence confirms Jesus crucifixion outside the Bible: The Babylonian Talmud.
Prophecies In The Bible. Researched By Simon Brown.
Did Ancient Clay Tablets Preserve the Story of Noah's Flood?
Pontius Pilate Inscription — Archaeology Confirms the Biblical Governor of Judea.
The Cambrian Explosion — Does It Support Evolution or Creation?
The World is Like a Ticking Bomb!
What I've noticed when I follow christ!
Videos
Over 100 Old Testament Bible Prophecies fulfilled of Jesus Christ. 1/3.
The Prophet Isaiah 53 Prophecy Part 1/3
DISCOVERED: The True Tomb of Jesus & The GREAT Stone to The Tomb.
No comments:
Post a Comment