The History, the Evidence, and the Scientific Facts Behind the Life, Death, and Resurrection of Jesus Christ;
Was Jesus Crucified, Raised from the Dead, and Why?
"Seek, and you will find." — Matthew 7:7
For nearly 2,000 years, the life, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus Christ have transformed the world more than any other event in history. Yet many people still ask the same questions:
Did Jesus really exist?
Was He truly crucified?
Did He really rise from the dead?
Is there any historical or scientific evidence that supports the Gospel accounts?
Why was Jesus crucified in the first place?
These are important questions that deserve careful investigation rather than blind acceptance or rejection.
Throughout this study we will examine the oldest available biblical manuscripts, ancient historical writings, archaeology, fulfilled prophecy, scientific research, and the testimony of both Christian and non-Christian sources. Rather than relying on tradition alone, we will compare the evidence and allow the facts to speak for themselves.
Many critics have claimed that the life of Jesus was invented or exaggerated by later Christians. However, if Jesus really lived, performed miracles, gathered thousands of followers, was publicly crucified under Pontius Pilate, and His disciples proclaimed His resurrection throughout the Roman Empire, we should expect history to preserve evidence of these events.
The remarkable fact is that it does.
Ancient historians, Jewish writers, Roman officials, archaeological discoveries, biblical manuscripts, and scientific investigations all provide pieces of a much larger picture.
This article brings together that evidence in one place.
What We Will Examine
Throughout this research we will answer the following questions:
Part 1 — Who Was Jesus?
A short introduction to Jesus Christ.
Part 2 — Historical Evidence
Did ancient historians write about Jesus?
Josephus
Tacitus
Thallus
Lucian of Samosata
The Babylonian Talmud
Other ancient writers
Part 3 — Eyewitness Evidence
Physical descriptions of Jesus.
People who lived during His lifetime.
The "Real Faces of the Bible."
Part 4 — Archaeological Evidence
Clay tablets.
Ancient inscriptions.
Historical places.
Archaeological discoveries connected with the Bible.
Part 5 — Biblical Evidence
Old Testament prophecies fulfilled by Jesus.
The reliability of the Gospels.
The parables of Jesus.
Part 6 — The Crucifixion
Historical evidence for crucifixion.
Roman records.
Contemporary witnesses.
The darkness and earthquake.
Part 7 — The Empty Tomb
Where was Jesus buried?
Is the tomb known today?
Early Christian testimony.
Part 8 — The Resurrection
Historical evidence.
The Shroud of Turin.
The Sudarium of Oviedo.
Scientific investigations.
Medical evidence.
Part 9 — Why Was Jesus Crucified?
The biblical explanation.
Jesus as God's sacrificial Lamb.
The meaning of His death.
Part 10 — The Final Verdict
What does all the evidence prove?
Why do many people still refuse to believe?
Part 1 — Who Was Jesus?
Around 2,000 years ago, God Almighty sent His only begotten Son, Jesus (Yeshua), into the world.
The Apostle Paul describes Him as:
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation." (Colossians 1:15)
Jesus came to reveal truths that had been hidden for generations.
As Matthew records:
"I will open My mouth in parables; I will utter things hidden since the foundation of the world." (Matthew 13:35)
Throughout His ministry Jesus fulfilled numerous Old Testament prophecies, always doing the will of His Father and bearing witness to the truth.
"For this reason I was born and have come into the world—to testify to the truth." (John 18:37)
More than anything else, Jesus came to reveal the One True God—His Father.
"Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One." (Mark 12:29)
He came to reverse the curse brought by Adam, to become our great High Priest, our Mediator, and ultimately the perfect sacrifice for sin.
John the Baptist announced Him by saying:
"Behold! The Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world." (John 1:29)
Unlike the repeated animal sacrifices of the Old Covenant, Jesus offered Himself once for all.
But how do we know these events really happened?
Can we trust the Gospel writers?
Are their accounts supported by history?
To answer those questions we must examine the oldest biblical manuscripts alongside the testimony of historians, archaeology, science, and independent ancient sources.
The evidence begins with one of the greatest Jewish historians of the first century—Flavius Josephus.
Part 2 — If Jesus Really Existed, What Evidence Should We Expect?
Before examining the ancient historians, it is worth asking a simple question.
If Jesus of Nazareth really was one of the most influential men who ever lived, what evidence should history have left behind?
Think about it for a moment.
If Jesus:
travelled throughout Judea and Galilee,
taught thousands of people,
healed the sick,
performed remarkable works,
confronted the religious leaders,
was publicly crucified under Pontius Pilate,
and His followers spread throughout the Roman Empire,
then we should reasonably expect to find evidence beyond the pages of the Bible.
We should expect historians to mention Him.
We should expect Roman officials to know about Him.
We should expect Jewish writers to discuss Him.
We should expect archaeology to uncover places connected with His life.
We should expect ancient manuscripts to preserve His teachings.
We should expect fulfilled prophecies to point towards Him.
We should expect scientific investigations to examine objects connected with His death and burial.
Remarkably, this is exactly what we find.
Although no single piece of evidence proves every aspect of Jesus' life, when all the historical, archaeological, manuscript, and scientific evidence is brought together, it forms a powerful body of testimony that deserves serious consideration.
The investigation begins with one of the greatest Jewish historians who ever lived.
Part 3 — Flavius Josephus
One of the strongest non-Christian witnesses to the historical Jesus is the first-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus.
Josephus was born around AD 37, only a few years after the crucifixion of Jesus. He was a Jewish priest, a Pharisee, military commander, and later an official historian employed by the Roman Empire.
Around AD 93–94, Josephus completed his famous work Antiquities of the Jews, a twenty-volume history of the Jewish people from Creation until the first century.
Because Josephus was not a Christian, his writings carry considerable historical importance. He had no reason to invent stories supporting Christianity. Instead, he simply recorded historical events as he understood them.
His works have become one of the most valuable historical sources for understanding first-century Judaism, the background of the New Testament, and the political world in which Jesus lived.
Did Josephus Mention Jesus?
The answer is yes.
Josephus refers to Jesus twice in Antiquities of the Jews.
The first passage is commonly known as the Testimonium Flavianum.
Although scholars recognise that some phrases were probably added by later Christian copyists, the overwhelming majority agree that Josephus originally wrote about Jesus as a real historical figure who lived during the governorship of Pontius Pilate.
His second reference is even stronger.
While describing the death of James, Josephus writes:
"...James, the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ..."
This passage is accepted by the vast majority of modern historians as authentic.
It confirms several important historical facts:
Jesus was a real historical person.
He was well known enough for James to be identified as his brother.
Jesus was known by the title "Christ."
James himself was an important historical figure.
For this reason, Josephus remains one of the earliest and most significant non-Christian witnesses to the existence of Jesus Christ.
What Does Modern Scholarship Say?
Today, historians from a wide range of religious backgrounds—including Christian, Jewish, agnostic, and atheist scholars—generally agree on three important conclusions regarding Josephus' writings.
First, the reference to James, the brother of Jesus, is regarded as authentic by the overwhelming majority of scholars.
Second, the longer passage about Jesus, known as the Testimonium Flavianum, has probably been altered by later Christian copyists.
Third, despite these later additions, most scholars conclude that Josephus originally wrote a genuine reference to Jesus, describing Him as a wise teacher who was crucified under Pontius Pilate and whose followers continued after His death.
This makes Josephus one of the earliest independent historical witnesses to the life of Jesus outside the New Testament.
Transition
But Josephus was not the only historian to mention Jesus.
The Roman Empire itself also preserved records referring to Christ and His execution.
One of the greatest Roman historians would later confirm that Jesus was executed under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Emperor Tiberius.
His name was Cornelius Tacitus.
Part 4 — More Ancient Historians Confirm Jesus
Josephus was not the only writer to record information about Jesus Christ.
As Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire, many historians, government officials, philosophers, and even opponents of Christianity wrote about Jesus and His followers.
What makes these testimonies especially valuable is that many of these writers were not Christians. They often had no desire to defend Christianity and, in some cases, openly criticised it. Yet despite their opposition, they still confirmed many of the central events recorded in the Gospels.
Together, these independent witnesses provide strong historical evidence that Jesus was a real person who lived in the first century, was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and whose followers believed He had risen from the dead.
Cornelius Tacitus
One of the greatest Roman historians was Cornelius Tacitus, born around AD 56.
Tacitus is widely regarded as one of the most accurate historians of the Roman Empire. Around AD 116, he wrote his famous work Annals, recording many important events during the reigns of the Roman emperors.
While describing Emperor Nero's persecution of Christians after the Great Fire of Rome in AD 64, Tacitus wrote:
"Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate."
This remarkable statement confirms several important historical facts.
Tacitus confirms:
• Jesus (Christ) was a real historical person.
• Jesus was executed.
• His execution took place during the reign of Emperor Tiberius.
• Pontius Pilate ordered His execution.
• Christianity had already spread throughout the Roman Empire within only a few decades of Jesus' death.
Because Tacitus was a Roman senator with access to official records, historians regard his testimony as one of the strongest non-Christian confirmations of the crucifixion of Jesus.
Thallus
One of the earliest historians connected with the events surrounding Jesus' crucifixion is Thallus.
Although his original writings have not survived, later historians quoted from his work.
Around AD 221, the Christian historian Julius Africanus quoted Thallus while discussing the darkness that covered the land during Jesus' crucifixion.
Africanus wrote:
"On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake..."
He then explains that Thallus attempted to explain the darkness as a solar eclipse.
Africanus rejected this explanation because the crucifixion occurred during Passover, when a solar eclipse is astronomically impossible due to the full moon.
Whether Thallus misunderstood the cause of the darkness or not, his testimony is significant because it indicates that unusual events associated with the crucifixion were already being discussed in the ancient world.
Lucian of Samosata
Another remarkable witness is Lucian of Samosata, a Greek satirist writing during the second century.
Lucian was not a Christian.
In fact, he mocked Christianity.
Yet even while ridiculing Christians, he confirmed several important historical facts.
Lucian wrote that Christians:
worshipped a man who had been crucified;
followed His teachings;
believed they would receive eternal life;
regarded one another as brothers;
willingly sacrificed wealth and possessions for their faith.
This is powerful testimony because it comes from someone who opposed Christianity rather than supported it.
His writings demonstrate that belief in the crucified Jesus was already widespread throughout the Roman Empire.
The Babylonian Talmud
Another important source comes from Jewish writings known as the Babylonian Talmud.
Although the Talmud strongly opposes Jesus, it nevertheless preserves traditions that acknowledge His existence.
One well-known passage states that:
"On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus the Nazarene."
In Jewish usage, the expression "hanged" commonly referred to someone who had first been executed and then displayed publicly, which is consistent with Roman crucifixion.
Although the Talmud rejects Jesus' claims and presents Him negatively, its testimony is important because hostile witnesses rarely invent the existence of the people they oppose.
Instead, the Talmud unintentionally confirms that Jesus was a real historical person whose execution was remembered within Jewish tradition.
Why These Ancient Sources Matter
None of these writers depended upon one another.
Some were Jews.
Some were Romans.
Some were Greeks.
Some were sympathetic.
Others were openly hostile.
Yet together they repeatedly confirm the same basic historical facts.
They agree that:
Jesus was a real historical person.
He lived in Judea during the first century.
He gathered followers.
He was known as Christ.
He was crucified under Pontius Pilate.
His followers rapidly spread throughout the Roman Empire.
They sincerely believed He had risen from the dead.
When independent witnesses from different cultures and backgrounds repeatedly confirm the same historical events, historians regard their combined testimony as far stronger than any single source considered alone.
The Next Question
If Jesus really lived, was crucified, and changed the course of history, we should expect to find more than written testimony.
Should archaeology also preserve evidence of the world in which Jesus lived?
The answer is yes.
In the next section we will examine archaeological discoveries that continue to confirm the historical reliability of the Bible and the world in which Jesus ministered.
Part 5 — Archaeology Confirms the World of Jesus
Some people believe the Bible is simply a collection of religious stories. However, one of the greatest strengths of the Bible is that it describes real people, real cities, real governments, and real historical events.
Unlike mythology, biblical history can often be tested through archaeology.
For more than two centuries, archaeologists have excavated thousands of sites throughout Israel and the surrounding lands. Time after time, discoveries have confirmed the historical setting in which Jesus lived.
Archaeology cannot prove someone's faith, but it can demonstrate whether the Bible accurately records the world in which its events took place.
Remarkably, it does.
Pontius Pilate
For many years critics questioned whether Pontius Pilate even existed.
Then, in 1961, archaeologists excavating the Roman theatre at Caesarea Maritima discovered a limestone inscription bearing his name.
The inscription reads:
"...Pontius Pilatus... Prefect of Judea..."
This discovery confirmed exactly what the Gospels had recorded nearly two thousand years earlier.
Today the Pilate Stone is displayed in the Israel Museum and is recognised as one of the most important archaeological discoveries relating to the New Testament.
The Pool of Bethesda
John's Gospel records that Jesus healed a disabled man beside the Pool of Bethesda.
For centuries sceptics claimed this pool was fictional because no one knew where it was.
However, archaeologists later uncovered the remains of the pool exactly where John's Gospel describes it—near the Sheep Gate in Jerusalem.
Even more remarkably, the excavation revealed that the pool had five porticoes, matching John's description precisely.
Once again archaeology confirmed the accuracy of the Gospel record.
The Pool of Siloam
John also records that Jesus healed a man born blind by sending him to wash in the Pool of Siloam.
In 2004, while repairing a sewer in Jerusalem, workers unexpectedly uncovered the actual pool.
Archaeologists identified it as the Pool of Siloam from the time of Jesus.
This discovery provided another remarkable confirmation of the Gospel narrative.
The House of Caiaphas
The Gospels record that Jesus was taken before the High Priest Caiaphas on the night of His arrest.
In 1990 archaeologists discovered an ornate burial ossuary bearing the inscription:
"Joseph son of Caiaphas."
Most scholars identify this as the family tomb of the High Priest who presided over Jesus' trial.
Nazareth
Some critics once argued that Nazareth did not even exist during the time of Jesus.
Today archaeologists have uncovered first-century homes, tombs, pottery, wine presses, agricultural terraces, and numerous artefacts proving that Nazareth was indeed a small Jewish village exactly as described in the New Testament.
The evidence leaves little doubt that Jesus grew up in a real village with a real community.
Crucifixion Confirmed
One of the strongest archaeological discoveries relating to the death of Jesus came in 1968.
Near Jerusalem archaeologists uncovered the remains of a crucified man named Yehohanan.
An iron nail was still driven through his heel bone.
This was the first physical archaeological evidence of Roman crucifixion ever discovered.
The find demonstrated that the Gospel descriptions of crucifixion accurately reflect Roman execution methods used during the first century.
Why Archaeology Matters
Every year archaeologists uncover new discoveries.
Some discoveries answer questions.
Others raise new ones.
Yet the overall trend has been remarkable.
Instead of disproving the Bible, archaeology has repeatedly confirmed its historical setting.
Cities once thought legendary have been discovered.
Government officials once questioned by sceptics have been identified.
Ancient inscriptions continue to verify names recorded in Scripture.
The Bible repeatedly proves itself to be rooted in genuine history.
Part 6 — Fulfilled Prophecy
Historical evidence is impressive.
Archaeological evidence is compelling.
But the Bible contains another remarkable form of evidence that no ordinary historical book possesses.
Hundreds of years before Jesus was born, the Hebrew Scriptures recorded detailed prophecies concerning the coming Messiah.
These were not vague predictions.
Many were written centuries before Jesus' birth.
Together they describe where He would be born, His ministry, His rejection, His suffering, His death, and even His resurrection.
If these prophecies were fulfilled, they provide powerful evidence that Jesus was not merely another religious teacher, but the promised Messiah foretold throughout the Old Testament.
In the following chapters we will examine some of the most remarkable Messianic prophecies ever written and compare them with the historical record.
Some of the Prophecies We Will Examine
Born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2)
Born of a virgin (Isaiah 7:14)
Descendant of David (Jeremiah 23:5)
Ministry in Galilee (Isaiah 9:1–2)
Entered Jerusalem on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9)
Betrayed for thirty pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:12–13)
Silent before His accusers (Isaiah 53:7)
Crucified with criminals (Isaiah 53:12)
Hands and feet pierced (Psalm 22)
Soldiers casting lots for His clothing (Psalm 22:18)
Buried with the rich (Isaiah 53:9)
Raised from the dead (Psalm 16:10)
The Evidence Continues to Build
So far, our investigation has examined:
✓ Ancient historians
✓ Roman records
✓ Jewish writings
✓ Archaeological discoveries
Next, we will examine perhaps the most famous object associated with Jesus' death—the Shroud of Turin.
Is it simply a medieval forgery?
Or could it be one of the greatest pieces of physical evidence ever discovered?
That is the question we shall investigate next.
My Own Research on the Shroud of Turin
Before we begin examining the evidence, I should mention that the Shroud of Turin has been one of my main areas of research for many years.
During my investigations into the historical evidence for Jesus Christ, I have spent countless hours studying the Shroud, examining scientific reports, historical documents, archaeological evidence, medical research, and the conclusions of both supporters and sceptics.
This research eventually led me to write my book:
The Shroud of Turin Speaks for Itself
In this book, I examine the historical, archaeological, medical, and scientific evidence surrounding what many believe to be the burial cloth of Jesus Christ. I also investigate some of the most common objections raised against its authenticity and compare them with the available evidence.
Although this chapter provides a summary of the evidence, my book explores the subject in much greater detail for those who wish to investigate it further.
As always, I encourage every reader to examine the evidence carefully and reach their own conclusions.
Part 7 — The Shroud of Turin
Could the Burial Cloth of Jesus Still Exist Today?
If Jesus was truly crucified, buried in a tomb, and wrapped in linen cloths, as all four Gospels record, then a reasonable question follows.
Could those burial cloths still exist today?
Throughout history, many objects have been claimed to be connected with Jesus.
Most have little or no historical evidence to support them.
However, one object stands apart from all the others.
For more than six hundred years, a single linen cloth has fascinated historians, scientists, doctors, archaeologists, artists, and theologians alike.
It is known as The Shroud of Turin.
Some believe it is the authentic burial cloth of Jesus Christ.
Others argue that it is a medieval forgery.
Unlike most religious relics, however, the Shroud has been subjected to extensive scientific examination.
The question is no longer simply one of faith.
It has become one of history, archaeology, medicine, chemistry, physics, biology, and forensic science.
What Is the Shroud of Turin?
The Shroud is a linen cloth measuring approximately 4.4 metres long and 1.1 metres wide.
It bears the faint front and back image of a man who appears to have suffered severe torture before death.
The wounds visible on the cloth remarkably correspond with the Gospel descriptions of Jesus' crucifixion.
These include:
Scourging over the entire body.
Puncture wounds around the head consistent with a crown of thorns.
Injuries to the shoulders from carrying a heavy object.
Nail wounds through the wrists.
Nail wounds through the feet.
A large wound in the side.
Blood flowing from numerous injuries.
For centuries no one understood how the image was formed.
Even today, despite decades of scientific investigation, no one has been able to reproduce it successfully.
Medical Evidence
One of the most remarkable aspects of the Shroud is its medical accuracy.
Doctors who have studied the image have noted numerous details that would have been almost impossible for a medieval artist to invent.
Among these are:
The Wounds
The body displays more than one hundred injuries consistent with Roman scourging.
The pattern matches the Roman flagrum, a whip fitted with metal or bone balls designed to tear flesh.
The Crown of Thorns
Rather than a simple ring around the head, the bloodstains suggest numerous puncture wounds covering much of the scalp.
This is exactly what would be expected if thorn branches had been pressed onto the head like a cap.
The Nail Wounds
Artists throughout history usually painted nails through the palms.
However, the image on the Shroud places the wounds through the wrists.
Modern medical studies have demonstrated that nails driven through the palms could not support the weight of a crucified body.
The wrists, however, could.
Remarkably, this was not understood until modern times.
The Side Wound
The wound in the side appears to show the separation of blood and watery fluid.
John records:
"One of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out." (John 19:34)
Modern medicine recognises that such separation can occur after death under certain conditions, adding another fascinating point for investigation.
The Blood
Scientific studies indicate that the stains are genuine blood.
Researchers have identified characteristics consistent with human blood.
Some studies have suggested the presence of AB blood type, although this remains a subject of discussion among researchers.
More significantly, the blood appears to have been on the cloth before the image itself was formed.
This has puzzled scientists for decades.
How Was the Image Formed?
This remains one of the greatest mysteries.
The image is not:
paint,
ink,
dye,
pigment,
scorch marks,
or any known artistic technique.
Microscopic examination shows that only the outermost fibres of the linen are discoloured.
The colouring penetrates only a tiny fraction into the fibres.
No known medieval method has been shown to produce an image with these characteristics.
Even NASA image analysts were surprised when digital analysis revealed something unexpected.
The Three-Dimensional Mystery
In 1976 scientists using the NASA VP-8 Image Analyzer made a remarkable discovery.
Ordinary photographs become distorted when processed for three-dimensional information.
The Shroud did not.
Instead, the brightness of the image appeared to correspond with the distance between the cloth and the body.
This produced accurate three-dimensional information.
To this day, ordinary paintings and photographs do not behave in this manner.
This unique property continues to puzzle researchers.
The 1988 Carbon Dating
Perhaps the greatest objection raised against the Shroud came in 1988.
Three laboratories independently dated a small sample of the cloth.
Their conclusion suggested a medieval date between AD 1260 and 1390.
For many people, the debate appeared settled.
However, the story did not end there.
Questions Raised About the Carbon Dating
Since 1988, numerous researchers have questioned whether the tested sample represented the original cloth.
Several arguments have been presented.
These include:
The sample may have come from a repaired medieval corner.
Fire damage and centuries of handling may have contaminated the fibres.
Later studies suggest the tested area differs chemically from the rest of the cloth.
Textile experts have argued that invisible repairs may have affected the dating.
Whether these arguments are correct continues to be debated.
What is clear is that the scientific discussion did not end in 1988.
In many ways, it had only just begun.
What Do Scientists Say Today?
Today the Shroud remains one of the most intensely studied archaeological objects in history.
Thousands of scientific papers have been written.
Some researchers conclude it is medieval.
Others believe it may be much older.
Some remain undecided.
Yet almost everyone agrees on one point.
No one has fully explained how the image was formed.
That mystery remains unsolved.
The Next Question
If the Shroud of Turin truly wrapped the body of Jesus, another important question naturally follows.
The Gospel of John tells us that two separate burial cloths were used.
One was the large linen shroud.
The other was a cloth wrapped around His head.
Could this second cloth still exist today?
The answer may surprise you.
In the next chapter we shall examine the remarkable evidence surrounding the Sudarium of Oviedo—another ancient cloth that many researchers believe was connected with the burial of Jesus Christ.
Further Reading
If you would like to study this subject in greater depth, I have written an entire book dedicated to the evidence surrounding the Shroud:
The Shroud of Turin Speaks for Itself
By Simon Brown
In this book I examine the historical, archaeological, forensic, medical, and scientific evidence surrounding the Shroud, together with the Sudarium of Oviedo, the Empty Tomb, and the resurrection accounts recorded in the Gospels.
My aim has never been simply to persuade people, but to encourage them to examine the evidence for themselves, just as Jesus said:
"Seek, and you will find." (Matthew 7:7)
Final Thoughts
As you have seen throughout this article, the evidence for the life, crucifixion, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ is vast. We have examined ancient historians, archaeology, fulfilled prophecy, biblical manuscripts, and scientific investigations, all of which contribute to the historical case for Jesus.
The truth is, I could continue presenting evidence for the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus almost indefinitely. There are countless discoveries, historical records, archaeological finds, and scientific studies that deserve careful examination.
However, as the Apostle John wrote at the close of his Gospel:
"Now there are also many other things that Jesus did. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that not even the world itself could contain the books that would be written." (John 21:25)
No single article could ever contain all the available evidence.
For that reason, I have provided links below to many of my other articles, including my extensive research on the Shroud of Turin, the Sudarium of Oviedo, and my documentary film and research into the Empty Tomb of Jesus. If you are willing to continue seeking the truth, I hope these resources will encourage you to investigate the evidence even further.
Thank you for taking the time to read my research.
May God richly bless you as you continue to seek the truth.
Simon Brown
"Seek, and you will find." — Matthew 7:7
Related Articles:
Tacitus on Jesus.
No comments:
Post a Comment