Simon Brown.

Join me on this journey. Let's seek the truth together! 💡 Proverbs 8:34-36 Blessed is the man who hears me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at my door posts. For whoever finds me finds life, and will obtain favor from Yahweh. But he who sins against me wrongs his own soul. All those who hate me love death.” Psalm 84: 11 For Yahweh God is a sun and a shield. Yahweh will give grace and glory. He withholds no good thing from those who walk blamelessly. 12 Yahweh of Armies, blessed is the man who trusts in you. 1 John 5:5 Now who is the one overcoming the world, except the one believing that Jesus is the Son of God.

Thursday, 6 August 2026

1 John 5:20 — Who Is "The True God"?

Quick Facts infographic examining 1 John 5:20, asking who "the true God" is by comparing the verse with John 17:3, the Greek text, and the surrounding biblical context.


This Quick Facts infographic examines one of the most debated verses in the New Testament. By comparing 1 John 5:20 with John 17:3 and the surrounding context, this study explores who John identifies as "the true God" and encourages readers to examine the Scriptures carefully before reaching a conclusion.

QUICK FACTS

1 John 5:20 — Who Is "The True God"?

One of the most debated verses in the New Testament is 1 John 5:20.

Many Christians are told that the final words of the verse—

"He is the true God and eternal life."

prove that Jesus is Almighty God.

But is that really what John was teaching?

Let's examine the biblical facts.


The Biblical Facts

  • John begins the verse by saying:

    "The Son of God has come..."

  • John explains why the Son came:

    "...so that we may know Him who is true."

  • The Son comes to reveal Someone else—the One who is true.

  • John had already recorded Jesus praying to the Father:

    "This is eternal life, that they know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent."

  • Notice that John uses the same expression:

    • "the true God"

    • "eternal life"

in both John 17:3 and 1 John 5:20.


Compare Scripture with Scripture

John's Gospel teaches:

  • The Father is the only true God.

  • Jesus is the One whom the Father sent.

John does not present these as contradictory ideas. Instead, the same themes appear again in 1 John 5:20.


A Simple Question

If John intended to teach that Jesus is the only true God, why had he already recorded Jesus praying to the Father:

"You are the only true God."

Why would John use the same expression again if he meant something completely different?


What This Article Examines

In this study we will examine:

  • Who is "Him who is true"?

  • Who is "the true God" in 1 John 5:20?

  • How does John 17:3 help explain this verse?

  • What does the Greek grammar and the immediate context indicate?

Rather than relying on assumptions, we will carefully compare Scripture with Scripture and examine John's words in their historical, grammatical, and contextual setting.

FULL NEW ARTICLE HERE: 

Greek text of 1 John 5:20

1 John 5:20 Codex Sinaiticus bible.

1 John 5:20 Codex Sinaiticus bible. Translation by Simon Brown.

What do Trinitarians believe?
Could this be true what most believe, and Trinitarians teach, that St John was teaching in 1 John 5:20, that GOD’s Son Jesus is BOTH the same one true GOD, and also the Son of His GOD?

Could this be true what most believe, and Trinitarians teach, that St John was teaching in 1 John 5:20, that GOD’s Son Jesus is BOTH the same one true GOD, and also the Son of His GOD?

Could this be true what most believe, and Trinitarians teach, that St John was teaching in 1 John 5:20, that GOD’s Son Jesus is BOTH the same one true GOD, and also the Son of His GOD?  Who was St John referring to by saying: He is the true God and eternal life?

1 John 5:20 — Who Is "The True God"?

One of the verses most frequently quoted to support the doctrine of the Trinity is 1 John 5:20. Many Christians believe that John's concluding words—

"He is the true God and eternal life."

refer directly to Jesus Christ.

But before accepting that conclusion, we should ask a very important question:

Is that what John actually intended to say, or does the context point us elsewhere?

As with every passage of Scripture, the immediate context, the wider context of John's writings, and the rest of the Bible should be allowed to explain the verse.

The opening words of 1 John 5:20 tell us that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding. But understanding of whom?

John immediately answers:

"...so that we may know Him who is true."

The obvious question now becomes:

Who is "Him who is true"?

Fortunately, John had already answered this question many years earlier in his Gospel.

Shortly before His crucifixion, Jesus prayed to His Father:

"And this is eternal life, that they know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent." (John 17:3)

Notice how closely this parallels the language of 1 John 5:20. In both passages John connects the true God with eternal life. Rather than introducing a new doctrine, John appears to be reaffirming the same truth that he had already recorded from the lips of Jesus.

The question, therefore, is not simply who is nearest in the sentence, but who has John consistently identified throughout his Gospel and his letters as "the true God"?

Let us now examine the verse carefully, one phrase at a time, comparing Scripture with Scripture, to discover what John was actually teaching.

Colossians 2:9 — Does This Verse Really Teach That Jesus Is God?

Quick Facts infographic examining Colossians 2:9, the meaning of Deity and Godhead, Trinitarian interpretations, Greek manuscripts, and the biblical evidence.

This Quick Facts poster examines one of the most frequently quoted passages used in support of the Trinity. Discover what Colossians 2:9 actually says, compare modern Bible translations with the Greek text, and examine whether the verse teaches that Jesus is Almighty God or that the fullness of God's divine nature dwells in His Son.

QUICK FACTS

Colossians 2:9 — Does This Verse Really Teach That Jesus Is God?

One of the most frequently quoted verses in support of the Trinity is Colossians 2:9:

"For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells bodily."

Many Christians are told that this verse proves Jesus is Almighty God.

But does it?

Let's examine the facts.

The Biblical Facts

  • Colossians 2:9 says that the fullness of Deity dwells in Christ.

  • The Greek word is θεότης (theotēs), meaning deity, divine nature, or the state of being God, not the word "Trinity."

  • The word "Trinity" never appears anywhere in the Bible.

  • Many modern Bible translations use the word "Deity," not "Godhead."

  • The verse does not say:

    • Jesus is the Father.

    • Jesus is one of three divine Persons.

    • Jesus is the Trinity.

It simply says that God's fullness dwells in Christ.

Compare Scripture with Scripture

Hebrews describes Jesus as:

"The radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of His nature."

This complements Colossians 2:9 by showing that Jesus perfectly reveals His Father. It does not explicitly state that Jesus is the same person as the Father.

Likewise, Jesus said:

"Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father." (John 14:9)

The context explains that Jesus perfectly reveals the Father to the world.

Another Important Question

If Paul intended to teach that Jesus is Almighty God, why did he not simply say so?

Why did he instead describe Christ as possessing the fullness of God's nature?

What This Article Examines

In this study we will examine:

  • The meaning of the Greek word θεότης (theotēs).

  • Why many translations read "Deity" rather than "Godhead."

  • Whether Colossians 2:9 teaches the Trinity.

  • How Colossians 2:9 harmonizes with Hebrews 1:3 and the rest of Paul's writings.

Rather than relying on later theological traditions, this article will examine the biblical text in its historical, grammatical, and contextual setting, allowing readers to compare the evidence and reach their own conclusions.

Related articles:

Quick Facts: Is God Really a Compound Unity Called the Trinity?

Quick Facts infographic examining whether God is a compound unity called the Trinity using Mark 12:29, Deuteronomy 6:4, and biblical evidence.

 This Quick Facts infographic examines one of Christianity's most important questions: Did Jesus teach that God is a compound unity called the Trinity? Compare Jesus' words in Mark 12:29 with Deuteronomy 6:4 and consider the biblical evidence for yourself.


QUICK FACTS

Is God Really a Compound Unity Called the Trinity?

One of the most important questions every Christian should ask is this:

When Jesus repeated the greatest commandment in the entire Bible, did He teach that God is three Persons, or did He simply affirm that God is one?

The answer may surprise many.

The Biblical Facts

  • Jesus quoted Deuteronomy 6:4 exactly as it was originally given:

    "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one." (Mark 12:29)

  • Jesus did not explain that "one" secretly meant three Persons.

  • The Jewish scribe immediately agreed with Jesus and replied:

    "You have truly said that HE is one, and there is no other besides HIM."

  • Notice carefully that the scribe spoke about HE and HIM—referring to the one God of Israel.

  • The scribe did not say:

    • "The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are one God."

    • "You, Jesus, are that one God."

    • "God is a compound unity."

  • Instead, he affirmed that HE is one and that there is no other besides Him.

  • Jesus did not correct the scribe.

  • Instead, Jesus praised his answer:

    "You are not far from the kingdom of God."

A Simple Question

If believing God is three co-equal Persons were essential for salvation, why didn't Jesus explain it here—when discussing the greatest commandment ever given?

Why did neither Jesus nor the scribe mention anything about:

  • Three Persons?

  • A Triune God?

  • A compound unity?

  • God being "one essence in three persons"?

They simply affirmed the words already revealed in Scripture:

The Lord our God is one.

The Main Question

Did Jesus believe exactly what Moses taught in Deuteronomy 6:4?

Or should we believe that the word "one" really means something entirely different?

That is the question this article will examine by looking carefully at the biblical evidence in its historical, grammatical, and contextual setting.






Wednesday, 5 August 2026

Is God One or Three Persons? – A Biblical Examination

Is God One or Three Persons? Bible study comparing the Trinity doctrine with Deuteronomy 6:4, Mark 12:29, and the Bible's teaching that Yahweh is one.

This study examines one of Christianity's most important questions: Is God one, or is God three persons called the Trinity? By comparing the traditional Trinity doctrine with passages such as Deuteronomy 6:4, Mark 12:29, John 17:3, and 1 Corinthians 8:6, readers are encouraged to search the Scriptures carefully and compare every doctrine with the clear teaching of Jesus and the apostles.

Is God One or Three Persons?

One of the most important questions every Christian should ask is:

What does the Bible actually say?

The Old Testament

Moses declared:

"Hear, O Israel: Yahweh our God, Yahweh is one."
Deuteronomy 6:4

This verse became the foundation of Israel's faith and was repeated daily by God's people.

Notice that Moses simply declares that Yahweh is one.

There is no mention of God being three persons or a Trinity.

Jesus Confirmed the Same Truth

When Jesus was asked which commandment was the greatest, He quoted Deuteronomy 6:4 without changing a single doctrine.

"The first is, 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.'"
Mark 12:29

Jesus reaffirmed the same confession of faith that Israel had believed for centuries.

Again, there is no mention of three divine persons or a Trinity.

An Important Question

If Jesus intended His followers to believe that God is three persons in one being, why did He simply repeat the words:

"The Lord our God, the Lord is one."

Why did He not explain that God is three persons sharing one divine nature?

The New Testament records no such explanation in this passage.

Search the Scriptures

Every Christian should carefully compare what later doctrines teach with what Jesus and the Scriptures actually say.

The Bible repeatedly declares that there is one God, and Jesus identified the Father as "the only true God" (John 17:3).

For that reason, it is essential that our understanding of God is built upon the clear teaching of Scripture rather than later theological formulations.

Is Jesus God? What Did Jesus Actually Say About Himself?

Is Jesus God? Quick Facts infographic examining what Jesus actually said about Himself using John 10:36, John 17:3, Mark 12:29, John 20:31, and other Bible passages.

This Quick Facts study examines one of the most important questions in Christianity: Who did Jesus say He was? By comparing the words of Jesus with passages such as John 10:36, John 17:3, John 20:31, Mark 12:29, and 1 Corinthians 8:6, this article encourages readers to search the Scriptures and test every doctrine against the Bible.


Is Jesus God?

What Did Jesus Actually Say About Himself?

Quick Facts

One of the most important questions every Christian should ask is:

Who did Jesus say He was?

Rather than relying on later traditions or theological systems, we should begin with the words of Jesus Himself.

What Must We Believe?

Jesus taught that eternal life is found through believing in Him and obeying His teaching.

"Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life."
John 3:36

"Whoever believes has eternal life."
John 6:47

John also writes:

"Whoever believes in Him is not condemned... because he has believed in the name of the only Son of God."
John 3:18

Notice that John says we must believe Jesus is the only Son of God.

Did Jesus Ever Say, "I Am God"?

Throughout the Gospels, Jesus never records the words:

  • "I am God."

  • "Worship Me because I am Almighty God."

  • "Believe that I am God in order to be saved."

Instead, Jesus repeatedly described Himself as the Son of God.

John 10:33–36

The Jewish leaders accused Jesus of making Himself God:

"You, being a man, make yourself God."
John 10:33

But notice Jesus' reply only a few verses later:

"...because I said, 'I am the Son of God'?"
John 10:36

Rather than affirming the accusation, Jesus identifies Himself as the Son of God.

What About Salvation?

The New Testament repeatedly connects salvation with believing that Jesus is:

  • the Christ,

  • the Messiah,

  • and the Son of God.

For example:

"These are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in His name."
John 20:31

John later adds:

"Who is it that overcomes the world except the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?"
1 John 5:5

The Greatest Commandment

When asked the greatest commandment, Jesus answered by quoting the Shema:

"Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one."
Mark 12:29

Jesus pointed His hearers back to Israel's historic confession of one God.

The Invitation

Jesus said:

"If you abide in My word, you are truly My disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."
John 8:31–32

Every Christian should carefully examine the Scriptures and ask:

Did Jesus teach that He is Almighty God, or did He consistently present Himself as the Messiah and the Son of God?

This article examines the key passages commonly used in this discussion and compares them with the words of Jesus Himself, encouraging every reader to search the Scriptures and reach their own conclusion.

Jesus Was a Unitarian Monotheist – Sir Anthony Buzzard.

Jesus Was a Unitarian Monotheist infographic featuring Sir Anthony Buzzard, Mark 12:29, John 17:3, and biblical teaching about the one true God.

This study examines the biblical teaching of Jesus concerning the one true God through the writings and lectures of Sir Anthony Buzzard. By exploring passages such as Mark 12:29 and John 17:3, readers are encouraged to compare the Scriptures and investigate the biblical understanding of monotheism.


Jesus Was a Unitarian Monotheist

The View of Sir Anthony Buzzard

By Simon Brown

One of the most important questions every Bible student should ask is:

What did Jesus Himself believe about God?

Throughout the Gospels, Jesus consistently affirmed the Jewish belief in one God, not three persons sharing one divine essence.

When asked which commandment was the greatest, Jesus replied:

"Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one."
Mark 12:29

Rather than introducing a new understanding of God, Jesus repeated the Shema of Deuteronomy 6:4—the foundational confession of biblical monotheism that Israel had believed for centuries.

Sir Anthony Buzzard's Observation

Biblical scholar and theologian Sir Anthony Buzzard has frequently argued that Jesus was a Unitarian monotheist, faithfully teaching the same belief about God found throughout the Old Testament.

He points out that throughout Scripture:

  • The Hebrew words Elohim, Adonai, and Yahweh, together with the Greek expression ὁ θεός (ho theos), overwhelmingly refer to the one God of Israel.

  • Across thousands of occurrences in the Bible, these words are never used to mean a Trinity.

  • In the New Testament, ὁ θεός ("the God") most commonly refers to the Father of Jesus Christ.

Jesus Himself prayed:

"This is eternal life, that they know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent."
John 17:3

Here Jesus clearly distinguishes the Father, whom He calls "the only true God," from Himself, the One whom the Father sent.

What About the Passages Commonly Used to Support the Trinity?

A small number of passages—such as John 20:28 and Psalm 45, quoted in Hebrews 1—are often discussed in debates about Christ's identity.

These verses deserve careful study within their original language, literary context, and the wider teaching of Scripture.

Whatever conclusions are reached about those passages, they should be considered alongside the many clear statements in which Jesus identifies the Father as His God and affirms the biblical confession that God is one.

The Historical Question

It is also worth considering the observation of New Testament scholar A. T. Hanson, who wrote:

"No responsible New Testament scholar would claim that the doctrine of the Trinity was taught by Jesus, or preached by the earliest Christians, or consciously held by any writer in the New Testament."

Whether every scholar agrees with that assessment is another matter, but it illustrates that the historical development of Trinitarian doctrine continues to be discussed within academic scholarship.

A Personal Prayer

May the one true God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, guide every sincere seeker into His truth through His beloved Son, Jesus the Messiah.

May we always be willing to search the Scriptures with humility, testing every doctrine by God's Word, just as the Bereans did.

"Now these Jews were more noble... for they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so."
Acts 17:11

21st Century Reformation logo, the ministry website featuring biblical articles, videos, and resources by Sir Anthony Buzzard.



Banner featuring Simon Brown and Sir Anthony Buzzard promoting interviews about the One True God, biblical truth, and Christian theology.

My interviews with Sir Anthony Buzzard!

In these interviews, I speak with biblical scholar Sir Anthony Buzzard about the One True God, the Kingdom of God, biblical theology, and the importance of testing every doctrine against the Scriptures.

Simon Brown

https://wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.com

"Anyone with ears to hear should listen and understand." — Matthew 11:15

"Who is he who overcomes the world except the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?" — 1 John 5:5

The House of David Inscription (Tel Dan Stele) – Archaeological Evidence for King David

The House of David Inscription (Tel Dan Stele) showing archaeological evidence for King David and the Davidic dynasty discovered at Tel Dan in northern Israel.

The Tel Dan Stele, also known as the House of David Inscription, is one of the most significant archaeological discoveries relating to the Bible. Dating to approximately 835 BC, it contains the phrase "House of David" and provides important historical evidence that the Davidic dynasty was recognised by Israel's neighbouring kingdoms.


The House of David Inscription (Tel Dan Stele)

Archaeological Evidence for King David

By Simon Brown

For many years, critics claimed that King David was nothing more than a legendary figure invented by the writers of the Bible. Since there was no archaeological evidence mentioning David outside the Scriptures, some argued that he had never existed.

That changed dramatically in 1993.

Archaeologists excavating at Tel Dan in northern Israel discovered a broken basalt stone inscription, now known as the Tel Dan Stele or House of David Inscription. This remarkable discovery contains the words "House of David," making it the earliest known extra-biblical reference to David's royal dynasty.

The inscription is generally believed to have been commissioned by Hazael, king of Aram (Damascus), or possibly by his son Bar-Hadad II/III, after a military victory over Israel and Judah. It is dated to approximately 835 BC, only around 150 years after the lifetime traditionally assigned to King David.

The phrase "House of David" refers to the royal dynasty founded by David, demonstrating that neighbouring kingdoms recognised the Davidic line. This is significant because enemies of Israel had no reason to invent a dynasty bearing David's name.

The Mesha Stele, discovered in modern-day Jordan, may also contain a reference to the House of David, although this reading continues to be discussed among scholars.

The discovery of the Tel Dan Stele does not prove every event recorded in David's life, such as his battle with Goliath, but it does provide powerful archaeological evidence that a Davidic dynasty was known in the ancient Near East.

Once again, archaeology has provided important evidence that supports the historical reliability of the Bible.

OLD ARTICLE

The House of David Inscription (Tel Dan Stele) showing archaeological evidence for King David and the Davidic dynasty discovered at Tel Dan in northern Israel.

Tuesday, 4 August 2026

Acts 20:28 – What Does the Original Greek Really Say?

 

Acts 20:28 Quick Facts infographic examining the original Greek, manuscript evidence, Bible translations, and textual variations in Acts 20:28.

This Quick Facts study explores Acts 20:28 by comparing the original Greek text, Codex Sinaiticus, modern Bible translations, and manuscript evidence. Learn why many translations include footnotes and why careful examination of the text is essential before drawing conclusions.


Acts 20:28 — Quick Facts

Do All Greek Manuscripts Really Say "God Purchased the Church with His Own Blood"?

One of the verses frequently cited in support of the doctrine that Jesus is God is Acts 20:28. But does the manuscript evidence really support that conclusion?

Quick Facts

  • The manuscripts of Acts 20:28 contain textual variations, including readings such as "church of God" and "church of the Lord."

  • Several modern Bible translations include footnotes informing readers that different ancient manuscripts preserve different readings.

  • Some translations also render the verse:

    "the church of God, which he obtained with the blood of his own Son,"
    or include this understanding in the footnotes.

  • The Greek expression τοῦ ἰδίου (tou idiou) literally means "of his own" and can be understood as referring to his own Son, depending on the context.

  • Because of these manuscript differences, many Bible scholars acknowledge that Acts 20:28 is a textually disputed passage.

  • The Codex Sinaiticus contains the reading "God" (Θεοῦ), while other manuscripts contain "Lord." This is one reason why modern translations often include explanatory footnotes.

Why the Footnotes Matter

Before building a doctrine on Acts 20:28, always read the translator's footnotes.

Acts 20:28 Quick Facts infographic examining the original Greek, manuscript evidence, Bible translations, and textual variations in Acts 20:28.

Acts 20:28 Quick Facts infographic examining the original Greek, manuscript evidence, Bible translations, and textual variations in Acts 20:28.

Many readers never notice that Bible translators themselves acknowledge alternative manuscript readings and possible translations.

What Does This Mean?

Acts 20:28 is one of several passages where the manuscript evidence is not entirely uniform. For that reason, the verse should be studied carefully alongside its textual notes, the original Greek, and the wider teaching of Scripture before using it as proof of any doctrine.

"Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica... examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so."Acts 17:11

Does Acts 7:59 Really Say Stephen Was "Calling Upon God"?

Acts 7:59 Quick Facts infographic comparing the King James Version, modern Bible translations, and the original Greek text to examine whether Stephen was calling upon God.

This Quick Facts study examines Acts 7:59 by comparing the King James Version, modern translations, and the original Greek text. Does the Greek actually contain the words "calling upon God," or were those words supplied by translators? Compare the evidence and decide for yourself.


Acts 7:59 — Quick Facts

Does Acts 7:59 Really Say Stephen Was "Calling Upon God"?

Acts 7:59 is sometimes quoted from the King James Version:

"And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit."

Many readers naturally assume the words "calling upon God" mean Stephen was directly calling Jesus God.

But is that what the Greek text actually says?

Quick Facts

  • The Greek text of Acts 7:59 does not contain the word "God" (θεός) in this verse.

  • Many modern translations simply read:

    "And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, 'Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.'"

  • The Greek verb ἐπικαλούμενον (epikaloumenon) means calling out, calling upon, or invoking, but the object "God" is not present in the Greek text.

  • The King James translators supplied the words "calling upon God" as part of their translation. In many editions, supplied words are indicated by italics.

  • The interlinear Greek text shows Stephen calling out and then saying:

    "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit."
    There is no Greek word for "God" in the verse itself.

  • Because of this, Acts 7:59 does not explicitly identify Jesus as God simply by using the phrase "calling upon God."

What Does This Mean?

Acts 7:59 certainly records Stephen addressing the risen Lord Jesus.

However, the verse itself does not contain the word "God" in the Greek text, so it should not be used as proof that Stephen called Jesus God on the basis of that added wording alone.

As always, every doctrine should be tested by comparing translations with the original Greek and by considering the wider teaching of Scripture.

"Test all things; hold fast what is good."1 Thessalonians 5:21


Related links:

Old article here:

The Shroud of Turin Research Library

 

The Shroud of Turin scientific evidence poster showing researcher Simon Brown examining the mysterious burial cloth of Jesus.

The Shroud of Turin is one of the most studied and mysterious objects in history. This poster highlights the scientific, historical, photographic and biblical evidence surrounding the linen cloth that may have covered the crucified body of Jesus Christ. Explore the bloodstains, three-dimensional image, pollen, fibres and other remarkable details in the research presented by Simon Brown.

Monday, 3 August 2026

The Cambrian Explosion — Does It Support Evolution or Creation?


Cambrian Explosion infographic showing trilobites, jellyfish, early marine animals, fossils, and the debate over evolution and biblical Creation.

This infographic illustrates the Cambrian Explosion, a period during which numerous complex animal groups first appear in the fossil record. It presents the scientific discovery alongside the questions it raises concerning evolutionary theory and the biblical account of Creation, encouraging readers to examine the evidence for themselves.

Fossil Jellyfish – More Than 500 Million Years Old, Yet Virtually Unchanged --

Fossil jellyfish more than 500 million years old compared with a modern jellyfish showing remarkable similarity in body structure.

This poster compares exceptionally preserved fossil jellyfish from the Middle Cambrian with living jellyfish today. According to the published geological timescale, these fossils are approximately 505 million years old and preserve extraordinary anatomical detail. The comparison invites readers to examine the fossil evidence and consider what it reveals about the history of life and biological change.


Fossil Jellyfish – More Than 500 Million Years Old, Yet Virtually Unchanged

One of the most remarkable fossil discoveries ever made has raised important questions about one of the central claims of evolutionary theory.

Researchers announced the discovery of exceptionally preserved fossil jellyfish in rocks they dated to more than 500 million years old. According to the research team, these fossils are around 200 million years older than the oldest jellyfish fossils previously known. Even more remarkable is that the fossils preserve such fine detail that scientists were able to relate them to modern groups and families of jellyfish.

If these dating estimates are accepted, then an obvious question follows.

Where is the evidence of major evolutionary change?

The fossil jellyfish look remarkably similar to the jellyfish living in our oceans today. Their essential body plan, structure, and overall design appear to have remained virtually unchanged throughout the entire period assigned to them by evolutionary geology.

The researchers themselves acknowledged that these fossils share characteristics with modern jellyfish and preserve the same basic complexity found in living species.

This presents an interesting challenge.

Evolution is commonly described as a gradual process of change over vast periods of time, with organisms continually adapting and transforming into new forms. Yet here we have creatures that, according to the evolutionary timescale, have existed for more than half a billion years while retaining essentially the same body plan.

If jellyfish have remained fundamentally the same throughout this immense period, why is there so little evidence of the gradual anatomical transformations that evolutionary theory predicts?

The Missing Transition

The discovery also creates another question.

Before these fossils were found, the oldest known jellyfish fossils were thought to be around 300 million years old. With a single discovery, that estimate suddenly increased by approximately 200 million years.

Such a dramatic revision naturally raises questions about how geological ages are determined and how much certainty can reasonably be placed on these estimates.

Furthermore, if jellyfish supposedly existed for hundreds of millions of years before these fossils were discovered, where are the countless intermediate fossils expected from such an enormous span of time?

The fossil record remains surprisingly sparse for soft-bodied creatures such as jellyfish, yet these fossils already display the characteristics of modern jellyfish rather than obvious transitional forms.

An Alternative Explanation

Those who accept the biblical account of Creation see these discoveries very differently.

Genesis records that God created living creatures to reproduce "according to their kinds" (Genesis 1:21, 24-25). From this perspective, jellyfish have always reproduced as jellyfish, preserving their basic created design while allowing for variation within their created kind.

Rather than demonstrating molecules-to-man evolution, these fossils can be understood as evidence of the remarkable stability of the original created kinds.

Whether one accepts the evolutionary timescale or not, the fossil jellyfish remain an extraordinary discovery.

After what is claimed to be more than 500 million years, they still look unmistakably like jellyfish.

Conclusion

The fossilized jellyfish do not settle the debate over origins, but they do present an important question.

If evolution is driven by continual large-scale change over immense periods of time, why do some of the earliest known jellyfish already possess the same basic body plan seen in living jellyfish today?

This remarkable discovery deserves careful consideration by anyone interested in the evidence surrounding the origin and history of life.


Original article here: The discovered Jellyfish that destroys Evolution.

RELATED ARTICLES

Sunday, 2 August 2026

Over 100 Questions for Those Who Believe Jesus Is God!

Christian infographic asking over 100 Bible questions about whether Jesus is Almighty God or the Son of God, featuring Scripture references including John 8:24, John 17:3, Philippians 2:12, 1 John 2:22, and Acts 17:11.

This Quick Facts poster presents over 100 Bible questions encouraging readers to examine what Jesus, the Father, and the apostles taught about the identity of Christ. It highlights key passages including John 8:24, John 17:3, Philippians 2:12, 1 John 2:22, and Acts 17:11, inviting every reader to search the Scriptures carefully and test every belief against God's Word. Read the complete study at https://wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.com/

John 14:9 — If You Have Seen Me, You Have Seen the Father

Christian infographic explaining John 14:9 with quick facts about Jesus revealing the Father, including John 14:10, Colossians 1:15, Hebrews 1:3, and key biblical references.

Jesus' words in John 14:9 have often been misunderstood. This infographic examines the immediate context and Jesus' own explanation in John 14:10, together with Colossians 1:15, Hebrews 1:3, and Philippians 2:6. Discover why seeing Jesus meant seeing the perfect revelation of the Father, and explore the full Bible study at https://wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.com/

John 14:9 — If You Have Seen Me, You Have Seen the Father

Quick Facts

John 14:9 is one of the most quoted verses in discussions about the identity of Jesus.

Jesus said:

"The one having seen Me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'?"
(John 14:9, Berean Literal Bible)

Quick Facts

  • Jesus did not say, "I am the Father."

  • Jesus did not say, "I am God the Father."

  • Jesus was explaining that He perfectly revealed His Father.

  • Jesus is the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15).

  • Jesus is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of His nature (Hebrews 1:3).

  • Jesus repeatedly taught that the Father was dwelling in Him and working through Him (John 14:10).

  • Seeing Jesus was seeing the perfect revelation of the Father's character, love, truth, and works.

The Key Question

If Jesus said,

"Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father,"

was He claiming to be the Father?

Or was He teaching that He perfectly revealed His Father to the world?

Let's examine the biblical context.


Part 1 – What Did Jesus Mean?

When Philip asked,

"Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us." (John 14:8)

Jesus replied,

"Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father." (John 14:9)

At first glance, some people conclude that Jesus was saying He is the Father.

But notice something important.

Jesus never says:

"I am the Father."

Nor does He say:

"I am God the Father."

Instead, Jesus answers Philip's request by explaining that His entire life had revealed the Father.

Everything Jesus said...

Everything He did...

Everything He taught...

Perfectly revealed the God who sent Him.


Part 2 – Jesus Immediately Explains His Own Words

The very next verse explains exactly what Jesus meant.

Jesus continues:

"Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in Me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on My own authority, but the Father who dwells in Me does His works." (John 14:10)

Notice carefully.

Jesus does not say,

"I am the Father."

Instead He says,

"The Father dwells in Me."

The Father was living and working through His Son.

This is why Jesus could say that seeing Him was seeing the Father.

Jesus perfectly revealed the Father's character, love, holiness, truth, and power.


Part 3 – Paul's Explanation

The Apostle Paul describes Jesus in exactly the same way.

He writes:

"He is the image of the invisible God." (Colossians 1:15)

Again,

"Christ, who is the image of God." (2 Corinthians 4:4)

And again,

"He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact representation of His nature." (Hebrews 1:3)

Notice the consistent language.

Jesus is:

  • the image,

  • the radiance,

  • the exact representation,

  • the form of God (Philippians 2:6).

These descriptions explain why Jesus said,

"Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father."

Jesus perfectly reveals the invisible God.


Part 4 – The Correct Meaning

Jesus came into the world to reveal His Father.

As the only begotten Son of God, He perfectly reflected His Father's character, glory, wisdom, holiness, love, mercy, and truth.

This is why Jesus could say:

"Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father."

Not because Jesus is the Father,

but because the Father was dwelling in Him, working through Him, and perfectly revealed by Him.

Jesus Himself explained this truth by saying:

"The Father who dwells in Me does His works." (John 14:10)

When we allow Jesus to explain His own words, John 14:9 becomes beautifully clear.

Jesus was not claiming to be the Father.

He was revealing the Father.



Saturday, 1 August 2026

Philippians 2:6 — Does "The Form of God" Mean Jesus Is Almighty God?

Quick Facts infographic examining Philippians 2:6, the meaning of "the form of God," the Greek word morphē, and whether Paul teaches that Jesus is Almighty God.

This Quick Facts infographic explores one of the most debated passages in Paul's letters—Philippians 2:6. Did Paul teach that Jesus is Almighty God, or was he explaining that Jesus perfectly reveals the image, character, and glory of His Father while remaining the obedient Son of God? Examine the Greek word morphē, the immediate context, and Paul's wider teaching to discover what the Scriptures say. Read the full article at https://wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.com/

Philippians 2:6 — Does "The Form of God" Mean Jesus Is Almighty God?

A Biblical Examination of Philippians 2:6

By Simon Brown


Part 1 – Quick Facts

One of the most frequently quoted passages used to support the belief that Jesus is Almighty God is Philippians 2:6.

Paul writes:

"Who, being in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped." (Philippians 2:6)

Many Christians read this verse and immediately conclude that Paul was teaching Jesus is God Himself.

But is that really what Paul meant?

Or is Paul teaching something entirely different?

Before reaching a conclusion, let us carefully examine the biblical evidence.


Quick Facts

  • Paul does not say, "Jesus was God."

  • Instead, Paul says Jesus was "in the form of God."

  • The Greek word translated "form" is μορφή (morphē), which refers to outward form, appearance, nature expressed, or visible manifestation. It does not automatically mean that someone is the very same person as another.

  • Throughout his letters, Paul consistently distinguishes between God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

  • Paul writes:

"Yet for us there is one God, the Father... and one Lord, Jesus Christ."
(1 Corinthians 8:6)

  • Paul never contradicts this statement anywhere else in his writings.

  • Paul also describes Jesus as:

    • the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15),

    • the image of God (2 Corinthians 4:4),

    • the radiance of God's glory (Hebrews 1:3),

    • the exact representation of His nature (Hebrews 1:3).

  • An image is not the same person as the one it represents.

  • A representation is not the original person.

  • Jesus perfectly reveals His Father's character, glory, holiness, and authority because He is God's only begotten Son.

  • Paul goes on to explain that Jesus humbled Himself, became obedient to death, and therefore God highly exalted Him (Philippians 2:8–9). The One who exalts Jesus is clearly distinguished from Jesus Himself.


The Question We Must Answer

When Paul wrote that Jesus was:

"In the form of God,"

was he teaching that Jesus is Almighty God?

Or was he teaching that Jesus perfectly reflected the image, character, glory, and nature of His Father while remaining the Son whom God sent into the world?

This is the question we shall examine.

Rather than relying upon tradition, we will carefully study:

  • the Greek word μορφή (morphē),

  • the immediate context of Philippians 2,

  • Paul's teaching elsewhere,

  • and the testimony of the whole Bible.

Like the Bereans, we should always examine the Scriptures carefully to see whether these things are so (Acts 17:11).


Part 1 – What Does Paul Actually Say?

Philippians 2:6 is one of the most frequently quoted passages used to support the belief that Jesus is Almighty God.

Paul writes:

"Who, being in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped."
(Philippians 2:6)

Many Christians immediately conclude that Paul is teaching Jesus is Almighty God Himself.

But before reaching that conclusion, we should ask a very simple question.

Is that actually what Paul wrote?

The answer is no.

Notice carefully what Paul did say.

He wrote that Jesus was:

"In the form of God."

Now notice what Paul did not say.

Paul does not write:

  • Jesus was God.

  • Jesus is Almighty God.

  • Jesus is the Father.

  • Jesus shares the same identity as the one God, the Father.

Instead, Paul deliberately chose the words:

"In the form of God."

Those words immediately raise an important question.

Why did Paul choose the expression "the form of God" instead of simply saying "Jesus was God"?

The answer is found by allowing Paul to explain his own words.

One of the safest principles of Bible study is:

Scripture explains Scripture.

Rather than beginning with later theological traditions, we should first examine how Paul describes Jesus throughout his own letters.

Remarkably, Paul repeatedly uses very similar language.

He writes that Jesus is:

  • the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15),

  • the image of God (2 Corinthians 4:4),

  • the radiance of God's glory (Hebrews 1:3),

  • the exact representation of God's nature (Hebrews 1:3).

Notice the consistent pattern.

Paul does not describe Jesus as the Father.

Instead, he presents Jesus as the perfect image and exact representation of His Father's character, glory, and nature.

Just as an image reflects the one it represents, Jesus perfectly reveals the invisible God to mankind.

A perfect representation is not the same person as the one being represented.

This agrees perfectly with Jesus' own teaching.

Jesus said:

"Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father."
(John 14:9)

But He immediately explained why:

"The words that I say to you I do not speak on My own authority, but the Father who dwells in Me does His works."
(John 14:10)

Jesus was not saying He was the Father.

He was explaining that the Father was living and working through Him.

Paul's description in Philippians 2:6 fits perfectly with this same truth.

The Son perfectly reveals His Father because He is the Father's unique and only begotten Son.

The next question therefore becomes:

What did Paul mean by the Greek word translated "form"?

That single word is the key to understanding Philippians 2:6.


Part 2 – What Does "The Form of God" Mean?

The key to understanding Philippians 2:6 is the expression:

"Who, being in the form of God..."
(Philippians 2:6)

What did Paul mean by "the form of God"?

The Greek word translated "form" is μορφή (morphē).

According to Strong's Concordance, morphē means:

"Form, shape, outward appearance."

It describes the visible expression of what someone is.

Notice again what Paul wrote.

He did not simply say:

"Who, being God..."

Instead, he carefully chose the words:

"Who, being in the form of God..."

Those additional words are significant.

If Paul's intention had been to teach that Jesus is Almighty God Himself, he could simply have written:

"Who, being God..."

But he did not.

Instead, Paul describes Jesus as being in the form of God.

The question therefore becomes:

Why did Paul choose this expression?

The answer becomes clear when we compare Philippians 2:6 with Paul's other writings.

Paul repeatedly describes Jesus using similar language.

He writes:

"He is the image of the invisible God."
(Colossians 1:15)

Again:

"Christ, who is the image of God."
(2 Corinthians 4:4)

And again:

"He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact representation of His nature."
(Hebrews 1:3)

Notice the remarkable consistency.

Paul speaks of:

  • form,

  • image,

  • radiance,

  • exact representation.

Each expression points to the same truth.

Jesus perfectly reveals His Father.

A person who is the image of another is not the same person as the one being imaged.

Likewise, an exact representation is not the same person as the one being represented.

Instead, it faithfully reveals the character and nature of the original.

This is exactly how Jesus described Himself.

He said:

"Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father."
(John 14:9)

But He immediately explained why:

"The words that I say to you I do not speak on My own authority, but the Father who dwells in Me does His works."
(John 14:10)

Jesus was not claiming to be His Father.

He was explaining that the Father was living and working through Him.

The same principle helps us understand Paul's words.

Jesus is in the form of God because He perfectly reflects His Father's character, glory, wisdom, holiness, and love.

As God's only begotten Son, He uniquely reveals the invisible God to mankind.

This understanding also fits perfectly with the rest of Paul's writings, where he consistently distinguishes between:

  • the one God, the Father, and

  • the one Lord, Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 8:6).

The next statement in Philippians 2:6 is just as important.

Paul says Jesus:

"Did not consider equality with God something to be grasped."

What did Paul mean by that?

Was he saying Jesus was equal with God?

Or was he saying exactly the opposite?

That is the next question we must examine.  

"...did not consider equality with God something to be grasped."

Let's carefully examine what Paul actually wrote.


Part 3 – Did Paul Teach That Jesus Was Equal with God?

After describing Jesus as being "in the form of God," Paul continues:

"...did not consider equality with God something to be grasped."
(Philippians 2:6)

This statement has often been interpreted to mean that Jesus already was Almighty God.

But is that really what Paul is saying?

Once again, we should begin by asking:

What does the text actually say?

Notice that Paul does not write:

"Jesus was equal with God."

Instead, Paul says Jesus did not consider equality with God something to be grasped.

The emphasis is not on Jesus declaring Himself equal with God.

The emphasis is on His attitude.

Rather than seeking His own glory or exalting Himself, Jesus chose the path of humility and obedience.

This becomes clear as we continue reading.

Paul writes:

"But emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death—even death on a cross."
(Philippians 2:7–8)

Notice the flow of Paul's argument.

He is not explaining who Jesus is in an abstract theological sense.

He is presenting Jesus as the supreme example of humility.

This is the whole purpose of the passage.

In fact, Paul begins the chapter by encouraging believers:

"Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves."
(Philippians 2:3)

Then he says:

"Have this mind among yourselves, which was also in Christ Jesus."
(Philippians 2:5)

Everything that follows is illustrating Christ's humility.

Jesus did not seek His own honour.

He did not exalt Himself.

He willingly humbled Himself and became obedient to His Father's will.

This perfectly agrees with Jesus' own words throughout John's Gospel.

Jesus repeatedly said:

"I seek not My own glory."
(John 8:50)

Again:

"I can do nothing on My own."
(John 5:30)

And again:

"The Father is greater than I."
(John 14:28)

Throughout His earthly ministry, Jesus consistently pointed away from Himself and gave all glory to His Father.

Paul is describing that same humble attitude in Philippians 2.

Rather than grasping for position, honour, or status, Jesus submitted Himself completely to the will of God.

This is why the next verse begins with one of the most important words in the chapter:

"Therefore..."
(Philippians 2:9)

Because Jesus humbled Himself and remained obedient, therefore God highly exalted Him.

Notice carefully.

Jesus does not exalt Himself.

God exalts Jesus.

The One who exalts is greater than the one who is exalted.

Paul writes:

"Therefore God highly exalted Him and bestowed on Him the name that is above every name."
(Philippians 2:9)

This is a vital point.

If Jesus already possessed the highest position as Almighty God Himself, why would God need to highly exalt Him?

Why would God need to bestow honour upon Him?

The answer is found in Jesus' perfect obedience.

The Father rewarded His faithful Son by exalting Him above every other human being and giving Him the highest place under Himself.

Far from teaching that Jesus is Almighty God, Paul presents a beautiful picture of the Father's love for His obedient Son.

The next section will examine this exaltation in greater detail and show how it fits perfectly with Paul's consistent teaching that there is:

"One God, the Father... and one Lord, Jesus Christ."
(1 Corinthians 8:6)


Part 4 – Why Did God Highly Exalt Jesus?

After describing Christ's humility and obedience, Paul reaches the climax of his argument.

He writes:

"Therefore God highly exalted Him and bestowed on Him the name that is above every name."
(Philippians 2:9)

The very first word is significant:

"Therefore..."

Paul is explaining why Jesus was exalted.

Because Jesus willingly humbled Himself...

Because He became obedient to His Father's will...

Because He endured death, even death on a cross...

Therefore God highly exalted Him.

Notice carefully who is acting.

Paul does not say that Jesus exalted Himself.

Nor does he say that Jesus simply returned to a position He already possessed.

Instead, Paul says:

God highly exalted Him.

This is one of the clearest distinctions between the Father and the Son in the New Testament.

There is:

  • the One who exalts, and

  • the One who is exalted.

Paul consistently identifies the Father as the One who acts.

The Father exalts.

The Son is exalted.

The Father gives.

The Son receives.

Paul continues:

"...and bestowed on Him the name that is above every name."
(Philippians 2:9)

Again, notice the wording.

The name was given to Jesus.

It was not something Jesus bestowed upon Himself.

Throughout the New Testament, Jesus repeatedly acknowledges that everything He has comes from His Father.

Jesus Himself said:

"All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me."
(Matthew 28:18)

Likewise, Jesus declared:

"The Father loves the Son and has given all things into His hand."
(John 3:35)

Again:

"All that the Father gives Me will come to Me."
(John 6:37)

And after His resurrection Jesus still referred to the Father as:

"My God and your God."
(John 20:17)

All of these passages present the same consistent picture.

The Father is the source.

The Son is the faithful recipient.

The Son receives His authority, glory, honour, and exaltation from His Father.

This also agrees perfectly with Peter's preaching.

Peter declared:

"The God of our fathers glorified His servant Jesus."
(Acts 3:13)

Notice once again.

It is God who glorifies Jesus.

Paul's words in Philippians 2 therefore fit beautifully with the rest of the New Testament.

Rather than presenting Jesus as exalting Himself, Paul shows the Father rewarding His obedient Son.

This is precisely why the chapter is such a powerful lesson in humility.

Jesus did not seek His own glory.

He trusted His Father completely.

And in due time, the Father highly exalted Him.

The next question naturally follows.

Does Paul teach this same distinction between God the Father and Jesus Christ elsewhere in his letters?

The answer is yes—and the consistency of Paul's teaching is remarkable.


Part 6 – Conclusion

When Philippians 2:6 is read in its immediate context and alongside the rest of Paul's writings, a clear and consistent picture emerges.

Paul does not simply say that Jesus was God.

Instead, he describes Jesus as being:

"In the form of God."

Throughout his letters, Paul consistently explains what this means.

Jesus is:

  • the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15),

  • the image of God (2 Corinthians 4:4),

  • the radiance of God's glory (Hebrews 1:3),

  • the exact representation of God's nature (Hebrews 1:3).

These descriptions reveal that Jesus perfectly reflects His Father's character, glory, holiness, wisdom, and love.

As the only begotten Son of God, He is the perfect revelation of the invisible God to mankind.

Paul then goes on to show Christ's extraordinary humility.

Rather than seeking His own glory, Jesus willingly humbled Himself, became obedient to His Father's will, and even accepted death on a cross.

Because of His perfect obedience,

"Therefore God highly exalted Him and bestowed on Him the name that is above every name."
(Philippians 2:9)

Notice the beautiful relationship that Paul describes.

The Father exalts.

The Son is exalted.

The Father gives.

The Son receives.

The Father sends.

The Son willingly obeys.

This same pattern appears throughout the New Testament.

Jesus continually gave all honour and glory to His Father.

He said:

"The Father is greater than I." (John 14:28)

He also prayed:

"This is eternal life, that they know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent." (John 17:3)

Paul's teaching harmonises perfectly with these words.

He never abandons the distinction between the one God, the Father, and the one Lord, Jesus Christ.

Instead, Philippians 2 presents Jesus as the perfect example of humility, obedience, and faithful service.

Far from grasping at honour for Himself, He humbled Himself completely and entrusted His life to His Father.

For that reason, God highly exalted Him and gave Him the highest place under Himself.

When we allow Paul to explain Paul, Philippians 2:6 fits beautifully with the whole testimony of Scripture.

The passage is not merely about Christ's identity.

It is a powerful call for every believer to imitate His humility, obedience, and complete trust in God.

As Paul himself says at the beginning of this chapter:

"Have this mind among yourselves, which was also in Christ Jesus." (Philippians 2:5)

That is the central lesson of Philippians 2.

May we follow the example of our Lord Jesus Christ by humbling ourselves, serving others, and giving all glory to the one true God, the Father.

And like the Bereans, may we continue to examine the Scriptures carefully, allowing God's Word to interpret itself rather than relying upon human tradition (Acts 17:11).