Simon Brown.

Join me on this journey. Let's seek the truth together! 💡 Proverbs 8:34-36 Blessed is the man who hears me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at my door posts. For whoever finds me finds life, and will obtain favor from Yahweh. But he who sins against me wrongs his own soul. All those who hate me love death.” Psalm 84: 11 For Yahweh God is a sun and a shield. Yahweh will give grace and glory. He withholds no good thing from those who walk blamelessly. 12 Yahweh of Armies, blessed is the man who trusts in you. 1 John 5:5 Now who is the one overcoming the world, except the one believing that Jesus is the Son of God.
Showing posts with label Ancient Mysteries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ancient Mysteries. Show all posts

Thursday, 20 August 2026

Evidence of Giants – Have Giants Been Discovered in America?

Detailed poster investigating claims of giant humans in North America, including alleged giant skeleton discoveries, enormous footprints, Death Valley cavern reports, ancient artifacts and biblical accounts of giants.

This detailed research poster examines controversial claims that unusually large humans once lived in North America. It explores reports of giant skeletons, enormous footprints, the alleged Death Valley cavern discoveries, ancient artifacts and biblical references to giants, while encouraging readers to distinguish genuine evidence from photographs, stories and claims that have not been independently verified. 

EVIDENCE OF GIANTS — HAVE GIANTS BEEN DISCOVERED IN AMERICA?

DID GIANTS ONCE LIVE IN NORTH AMERICA?

Throughout history there have been extraordinary stories of unusually large human beings and alleged discoveries of gigantic human remains.

The Bible itself contains numerous references to giants and exceptionally large warriors. Therefore, for Bible researchers, the question naturally arises:

IF GIANTS REALLY EXISTED, COULD PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF THEM STILL BE DISCOVERED?

Dear reader, before examining the material below, I want to make something very clear.

Some photographs, videos and stories circulating on the Internet claiming to show giant human skeletons have been demonstrated to be fabricated, digitally manipulated or presented without reliable archaeological documentation.

Therefore:

WE MUST BE CAREFUL.

We should neither believe everything we see nor automatically dismiss every unusual archaeological claim without investigation.


WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY ABOUT GIANTS?

The existence of giants is certainly not foreign to the biblical record.

Genesis tells us:

“The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward…”

Genesis 6:4

The Old Testament later describes unusually large people and formidable warriors, including the descendants of Anak and the Rephaim.

Perhaps the most famous example is Goliath, the Philistine warrior defeated by David.

Whatever conclusions we reach concerning archaeological claims today, the biblical writers clearly believed that exceptionally large people existed.

That makes the historical question worth investigating.


CLAIMS OF GIANTS IN AMERICA

For generations, stories and old newspaper reports have claimed that unusually large human skeletons were discovered in different parts of North America.

One particularly dramatic story concerns Death Valley, California, where enormous underground chambers or caves were allegedly discovered containing unusual artifacts and evidence of very large people.

Accounts associated with these stories have mentioned:

  • Enormous human remains

  • Elaborate caves or underground chambers

  • Ancient mines

  • Gold-colored spears

  • Polished stone

  • Strange symbols

  • Unusual archaeological artifacts

Some versions of these stories further claim that discoveries were reported to institutions such as the Smithsonian Institution but subsequently disappeared from public view.

However, this is where we must distinguish a fascinating claim from verified evidence.

An old newspaper story or eyewitness account can provide a historical lead worth investigating, but it does not by itself establish that giant human skeletons were scientifically authenticated.


DID THE SMITHSONIAN HIDE GIANT SKELETONS?

This allegation appears repeatedly in alternative-history literature.

According to the claim, giant skeletons discovered throughout America were collected or removed by major institutions and subsequently concealed because they contradicted conventional ideas about human history.

That would obviously be an extraordinary discovery if documentary evidence could establish that it happened.

But we should not simply state that the Smithsonian deliberately destroyed giant skeletons unless reliable records demonstrate it.

Instead, we should ask:

WHERE ARE THE ORIGINAL BONES?

WHERE ARE THE EXCAVATION REPORTS?

WHERE ARE THE MUSEUM RECORDS?

WERE THE SKELETONS MEASURED BY QUALIFIED ANTHROPOLOGISTS?

DO ORIGINAL PHOTOGRAPHS OR DOCUMENTS SURVIVE?

These are the questions capable of transforming an extraordinary story into historical evidence.


WHAT ABOUT PHOTOGRAPHS AND VIDEOS OF GIANT SKELETONS?

This is particularly important.

Many dramatic images supposedly showing archaeologists excavating enormous human skeletons have circulated online.

Some are fake.

Modern image manipulation—and now artificial intelligence—makes creating convincing images easier than ever.

Therefore a photograph alone should never be regarded as sufficient evidence.

We need its provenance:

Who took it?

When was it taken?

Where was the skeleton discovered?

Who excavated it?

Where are the bones today?

Were they scientifically examined?

Without those answers, an extraordinary photograph remains interesting—but unproven.


CHRISTIANS SHOULD NOT BE AFRAID OF INVESTIGATION

As Christians, we do not need fabricated evidence to defend the Bible.

If something is fake, we should expose it as fake.

If something is genuine, we should investigate it carefully.

And if the evidence remains uncertain, we should simply say:

WE DON'T YET KNOW.

Truth does not need exaggeration.

This is particularly important because fabricated archaeological discoveries can actually damage legitimate biblical research.

A skeptic only needs to demonstrate that one famous photograph was digitally created, and suddenly genuinely interesting evidence may be dismissed alongside it.

That is why discernment matters.


KEEP AN OPEN MIND — BUT TEST THE EVIDENCE

I believe we should remain open-minded concerning reports of unusually large human remains.

The Bible gives us good reason to investigate the historical existence of giants.

But an open mind should work in both directions.

We should not reject evidence merely because it challenges conventional thinking.

Neither should we accept evidence merely because it appears to support something we already believe.

Investigate it.

Check its source.

Look for original documentation.

Compare different accounts.

And separate established facts from speculation.


MY CONCLUSION

Did giants once walk the earth?

The Bible certainly records giants and exceptionally large people.

Have giant human skeletons been discovered in America?

There are numerous historical claims, newspaper reports and stories saying that unusually large skeletons were found.

But each individual claim needs to be investigated on its own evidence.

The video and material presented with this article should therefore be viewed with caution.

I am not claiming that every photograph, video or story is genuine.

Rather, I am asking readers to examine the evidence for themselves.

BE OPEN-MINDED.

BUT ALSO BE ON YOUR GUARD.

Because whether evidence comes from believers, skeptics, creationists or evolutionists, our standard should remain the same:

IS IT TRUE?

That is the question that matters.

Research and commentary by Simon Brown

Source material referenced: Pravda English article, “Giants in Americas – Death Valley, California – Cavern Temple of Giants.”

RELATED ARTICLES

The Discovery of Giants at the Nevada Caves and the Ancient Inscription Connected to Goliath

Wonderful Books on Biblical Archaeology – Discover the Evidence for the Bible.

The Astartu Relief – Bible Archaeology at Its Best.

 Did Ancient Clay Tablets Preserve the Story of Noah's Flood?

  Pontius Pilate's Roman Coins – Archaeological Evidence from the Time of Jesus

• The Lachish Letters Reveal the Divine Name of God

Has The Staff, or Rod of Moses been discovered?

• What Did Sir Isaac Newton Really Believe About God, Christ, and the Trinity?

• Josephus on Jesus – One of the Most Important Non-Biblical Witnesses

• Could These Bones Be Those of John the Baptist?

• The Discovery of the Great Stone of Mark 16:4

• The History, Evidence, and Resurrection of Jesus Christ

The History, the Evidence, and the Scientific Facts Behind the Life, Death, and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.

 Josephus on Jesus – One of the Most Important Non-Biblical Witnesses.

 Historicity of Jesus – The Historical Evidence for Jesus Christ

Evidence confirms Jesus crucifixion outside the Bible: The Babylonian Talmud.

Prophecies In The Bible. Researched By Simon Brown.

Did Ancient Clay Tablets Preserve the Story of Noah's Flood?

Pontius Pilate Inscription — Archaeology Confirms the Biblical Governor of Judea.

The Cambrian Explosion — Does It Support Evolution or Creation?



The World is Like a Ticking Bomb!

What I've noticed when I follow christ!

Videos

Over 100 Old Testament Bible Prophecies fulfilled of Jesus Christ. 1/3.

The Prophet Isaiah 53 Prophecy Part 1/3

DISCOVERED: The True Tomb of Jesus & The GREAT Stone to The Tomb.


The Mysterious Ica Stones of Peru – Ancient Evidence or an Elaborate Hoax?

 

Detailed poster showing the mysterious Ica Stones of Peru, including engraved stones depicting dinosaur-like creatures, humans, medicine, astronomy and alleged advanced technology, examining whether they are genuine ancient artifacts or an elaborate modern hoax.

The Ica Stones are among Peru's most controversial archaeological mysteries. Thousands of engraved stones have been associated with Ica, with some appearing to depict humans alongside dinosaur-like creatures and other extraordinary scenes. This research poster examines both sides of the controversy, including Dr. Javier Cabrera's famous collection, evidence of modern reproductions, and the unanswered question of whether any securely documented examples could be genuinely ancient.

THE MYSTERIOUS ICA STONES OF PERU

ANCIENT EVIDENCE OR AN ELABORATE HOAX?

Among the many controversial archaeological objects discovered—or claimed to have been discovered—around the world, few are quite as extraordinary as the Ica Stones of Peru.

Thousands of engraved stones have become associated with the region of Ica, Peru.

What makes them so controversial is not simply their number.

It is what some of them appear to show.

There are stones depicting animals.

There are stones depicting human figures.

There are stones interpreted as showing medical procedures.

There are strange astronomical-looking designs.

But most controversial of all are engravings that appear to portray creatures resembling dinosaurs alongside human beings.

If even a small number of these extraordinary stones could be demonstrated scientifically to have been engraved in antiquity, the implications would be enormous.

But there is an equally important problem:

Modern Ica stones are known to have been manufactured.

So we need to separate what is known from what is claimed.


WHAT ARE THE ICA STONES?

The Ica Stones are engraved stones associated with Ica Province in Peru.

They are generally made from andesite and occur in many different sizes.

Their engraved designs range from relatively ordinary subjects—animals, plants and people—to much more extraordinary scenes.

Some stones have been interpreted as depicting:

  • Dinosaurs

  • Humans interacting with dinosaur-like creatures

  • Surgical operations

  • Astronomy

  • Maps

  • Telescopes or optical instruments

  • Advanced technology

  • Strange flying objects

There have reportedly been thousands of stones associated with the phenomenon.

That immediately raises an intriguing question:

WHO MADE THEM?

And perhaps more importantly:

WHEN WERE THE ENGRAVINGS ACTUALLY MADE?


DR JAVIER CABRERA AND THE ICA STONES

The man most closely associated with the stones was Peruvian physician Dr Javier Cabrera Darquea.

Beginning during the 1960s, Cabrera accumulated a very large collection of engraved stones.

He became convinced that the stones preserved information from an extremely ancient and technologically sophisticated civilization.

Eventually, his collection numbered in the thousands.

Cabrera devoted an enormous amount of his life to studying and displaying them.

But collecting thousands of mysterious stones does not establish their antiquity.

The central question remains:

CAN THE ENGRAVINGS THEMSELVES BE AUTHENTICATED?

This is where the controversy becomes much more complicated.


THE HOAX EXPLANATION

Any serious investigation of the Ica Stones must acknowledge the strongest evidence against them.

A farmer named Basilio Uschuya, who supplied many stones to Cabrera and other collectors, admitted that he had produced engraved stones himself.

He reportedly described engraving stones and artificially ageing their appearance.

This is extremely important evidence.

It establishes something that should not be ignored:

SOME ICA STONES WERE MODERNLY MANUFACTURED.

That fact alone, however, leads to another question.

Does evidence that some stones were manufactured for collectors and tourists prove that every engraved stone associated with Ica has the same origin?

Those are not necessarily identical propositions.

The correct archaeological approach should therefore be to investigate individual stones with documented provenance rather than assuming that thousands of objects must all have one origin merely because some examples were demonstrably manufactured.


WERE THE CONFESSIONS THE END OF THE STORY?

Supporters of the stones have challenged the significance of the admissions made by people involved in selling them.

One argument is that selling genuine archaeological material could have created legal problems, giving sellers an incentive to describe the objects as modern creations.

Claims have therefore circulated that admissions of forgery were motivated by fear of prosecution.

But this argument must be treated carefully.

A possible motive for making a false confession does not prove that the confession was false.

Likewise, evidence that one person produced modern stones does not automatically determine the history of every stone in every collection.

This is precisely why provenance and scientific examination are so important.

We need evidence—not assumptions from either side.


THE DINOSAUR STONES

These are undoubtedly the most famous and controversial examples.

Some engravings appear to depict creatures remarkably similar to dinosaurs.

Certain stones have been interpreted as showing humans:

Hunting them.

Observing them.

Interacting with them.

And perhaps even:

Domesticating them.

This creates the enormous controversy surrounding the collection.

According to the conventional scientific chronology, non-avian dinosaurs disappeared approximately 66 million years before modern humans existed.

Therefore, an authentic ancient depiction showing humans interacting with recognizable dinosaurs would present an extraordinary archaeological problem.

But resemblance alone cannot establish authenticity.

A modern engraver already familiar with dinosaur illustrations could obviously produce such an image.

So the decisive question is not:

“DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A DINOSAUR?”

It clearly may.

The real question is:

“HOW OLD IS THE ENGRAVING?”

That is the question upon which the entire argument ultimately depends.


CAN THE STONES THEMSELVES BE DATED?

This is another problem frequently misunderstood in discussions of the Ica Stones.

The geological age of a stone does not tell us when somebody carved it.

A rock could be millions of years old and have been engraved yesterday.

What researchers therefore need to establish is the antiquity of the engraved surface.

That requires careful examination of such things as:

  • Provenance

  • Archaeological context

  • Weathering

  • Patination

  • Microscopic characteristics of the incisions

  • Deposits within engraved grooves

  • Evidence of modern tools

  • Reliable documentation of when and where a particular specimen was recovered

Without secure archaeological provenance, spectacular imagery by itself cannot establish antiquity.

This is one of the greatest weaknesses surrounding the Ica Stone controversy.


BUT THERE IS ANOTHER QUESTION

Were engraved stones known in Peru before Cabrera's collection became famous?

This question deserves serious historical investigation.

If securely documented engraved stones existed in museums, archaeological collections or publications before the modern commercial market developed, those examples would be considerably more important than stones bought from sellers who were known to manufacture them.

The history of the phenomenon therefore matters enormously.

We should not simply ask:

“Are Ica Stones fake?”

That question may be far too broad.

Instead we should ask:

Which stones?

Where were they discovered?

Who discovered them?

Was the archaeological context documented?

When were they first recorded?

Have their engraved surfaces been independently examined?

Those questions can potentially separate genuine archaeological material from modern tourist carvings.


WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER STRANGE IMAGES?

Dinosaurs are only one part of the mystery.

Other stones have been interpreted as showing complicated medical procedures, astronomical observations and technological devices.

Some enthusiasts have gone considerably further, interpreting certain images as evidence of aircraft, extraterrestrial visitors or unknown ancient civilizations.

These interpretations are fascinating—but an unusual-looking engraving is not proof of an advanced machine or extraterrestrial encounter.

We must distinguish between:

what an engraving physically shows

and

what modern observers believe the engraving represents.

That distinction is essential.


ANCIENT VISITORS AND THE BOOK OF ENOCH?

Another fascinating interpretation concerns figures that some people believe resemble strange visitors or beings associated with advanced knowledge.

This has sometimes been compared with the account in the Book of Enoch, where rebellious Watchers descend and teach humanity forbidden knowledge.

That comparison is certainly interesting from a religious and historical perspective.

But similarity between two stories or images is not archaeological proof that they describe the same event.

It remains an interpretation.

For me, however, it raises a fascinating question worth investigating rather than simply dismissing.


WHAT ABOUT OTHER ANCIENT DINOSAUR-LIKE ART?

The Ica Stones are not the only objects claimed to portray creatures resembling dinosaurs.

Around the world, researchers and creationist writers have pointed to carvings, sculptures, pottery, legends and other works of art that they believe resemble extinct animals.

Some examples are genuinely intriguing.

Others have alternative explanations.

And some purported archaeological discoveries have themselves become subjects of authenticity disputes.

Therefore each object must be investigated individually.

We cannot prove the Ica Stones authentic merely by finding another controversial object somewhere else.

But neither should an unusual ancient representation automatically be dismissed simply because it conflicts with what we expected ancient people to know.

The evidence should determine the conclusion.


WHAT ABOUT HUMAN AND DINOSAUR FOOTPRINTS?

Claims have also been made that human footprints have been discovered alongside dinosaur tracks.

Such claims are frequently presented as evidence that humans and dinosaurs lived together.

Again, these examples require careful investigation.

A footprint-like impression must be demonstrated to be genuinely human, genuinely ancient and genuinely contemporary with the dinosaur track-bearing layer before such an extraordinary conclusion can be established.

This illustrates an important principle that applies equally to the Ica Stones:

EXTRAORDINARY ARCHAEOLOGICAL CLAIMS REQUIRE STRONG PHYSICAL EVIDENCE.

Faith and science do not require us to accept weak evidence.

Truth has nothing to fear from careful investigation.


WHAT DOES THE BIBLE ACTUALLY SAY?

The Bible contains an extraordinary description of a creature called Behemoth.

In Job 40, God says:

“Behold now Behemoth, which I made with you; he eats grass like an ox.”

The description continues by emphasizing its tremendous strength, powerful bones and remarkable tail:

“He bends his tail like a cedar.”

Job 40:15, 17 — Berean Literal Bible

The identity of Behemoth remains debated.

Some identify it with a hippopotamus or another known animal.

Others believe the description could refer to a creature much larger and more dinosaur-like.

I find the passage extremely interesting, particularly because Job describes Behemoth as a real creature within God's creation.

But we should also be careful not to make the Ica Stones prove Job—or make Job prove the Ica Stones.

They are separate questions.

If the stones are authentic, scientific investigation should be capable of producing evidence for their antiquity independently.


THE MOST IMPORTANT DISTINCTION

There is one distinction I believe everyone investigating these objects should remember:

MODERN ICA STONES EXIST.

That is established.

But the existence of modern reproductions does not logically demonstrate that every engraved stone ever associated with Ica must necessarily be modern.

Conversely, the existence of thousands of stones does not prove that any extraordinary example is ancient.

Both sides require evidence.

What we really need are stones with:

secure provenance, documented archaeological context and independently verified ancient engraving surfaces.

That would move the discussion beyond speculation.


MY CONCLUSION

After looking again at this subject, I do not believe we should present every Ica Stone as proven ancient evidence of humans living alongside dinosaurs.

The evidence simply does not justify making that statement as an established archaeological fact.

We know that modern stones were produced.

That has to be acknowledged.

But I am equally interested in a different question:

DOES THAT EXPLAIN EVERY ICA STONE?

That is where I believe the investigation becomes fascinating.

Were some engraved stones known before the tourist industry surrounding them?

Are there specimens with genuinely documented archaeological provenance?

Have any such examples undergone modern microscopic and geological examination capable of establishing significant antiquity of the engravings themselves?

If so, those are the stones we should investigate.

Not merely the most spectacular examples.

Not merely the ones showing dinosaurs.

And not merely the ones sold to collectors.

We should follow the evidence wherever it leads.

If every extraordinary Ica Stone ultimately proves modern, then we should accept that conclusion.

But if even one securely excavated specimen depicting something genuinely impossible according to conventional chronology could be authenticated, then that specimen would deserve enormous scientific attention.

That is why I believe the Ica Stones remain such a fascinating subject.


ANCIENT HISTORY OR MODERN MYSTERY?

Perhaps the greatest mistake is choosing our conclusion before examining the evidence.

Some people desperately want these stones to be genuine.

Others may dismiss the entire subject the moment they hear the word “dinosaur.”

Neither approach is good research.

The correct question is much simpler:

WHAT DOES THE EVIDENCE ACTUALLY SHOW?

Separate the genuine from the fake.

Separate documented history from later stories.

Separate what the images actually depict from what we imagine they depict.

And above all:

TEST THE STONES.

Because if extraordinary archaeological evidence really exists, it should not need exaggeration to make it extraordinary.

The truth will be remarkable enough.


Research and article by Simon Brown

wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.com

RELATED ARTICLES

Wonderful Books on Biblical Archaeology – Discover the Evidence for the Bible.

The Astartu Relief – Bible Archaeology at Its Best.

 Did Ancient Clay Tablets Preserve the Story of Noah's Flood?

  Pontius Pilate's Roman Coins – Archaeological Evidence from the Time of Jesus

• The Lachish Letters Reveal the Divine Name of God

Has The Staff, or Rod of Moses been discovered?

• What Did Sir Isaac Newton Really Believe About God, Christ, and the Trinity?

• Josephus on Jesus – One of the Most Important Non-Biblical Witnesses

• Could These Bones Be Those of John the Baptist?

• The Discovery of the Great Stone of Mark 16:4

• The History, Evidence, and Resurrection of Jesus Christ

The History, the Evidence, and the Scientific Facts Behind the Life, Death, and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.

 Josephus on Jesus – One of the Most Important Non-Biblical Witnesses.

 Historicity of Jesus – The Historical Evidence for Jesus Christ

Evidence confirms Jesus crucifixion outside the Bible: The Babylonian Talmud.

Prophecies In The Bible. Researched By Simon Brown.

Did Ancient Clay Tablets Preserve the Story of Noah's Flood?

Pontius Pilate Inscription — Archaeology Confirms the Biblical Governor of Judea.

The Cambrian Explosion — Does It Support Evolution or Creation?



The World is Like a Ticking Bomb!

What I've noticed when I follow christ!

Videos

Over 100 Old Testament Bible Prophecies fulfilled of Jesus Christ. 1/3.

The Prophet Isaiah 53 Prophecy Part 1/3

DISCOVERED: The True Tomb of Jesus & The GREAT Stone to The Tomb.