Dear friends, please would you pray for our dear
friend David Hines, as he has been very sick.
He just sent me this message saying:
Hi Simon
I've been sick for almost 3 months now.
I've been having some chest pains and heart pain. I went to a ER yesterday but
they could not find anything in chest xrays, or cat scan or blood or EKG. A
mystery illness. I think the mosquito disease virus may have got into my
heart. I don't think so. But it's possible. It doesn't feel right.
Something is wrong with me but I don't know what it is.
My future here on Earth is in the hands
of the Lord.
David Hines
Shroud
of Turin was thoroughly examined by no less than 7 Forensic Pathologists and
blood chemistry experts. Their testimony is the ONLY VALID TESTIMONY in regards
to the authenticity of the Shroud because the Shroud of Turin case file is
primarily a question of Did a genuine dead body make contact with the cloth or
not? They answered that question with 100% certainty.
Yes,
a genuine dead body made contact with the Shroud of Turin. A forensic
pathologist working with a blood chemistry expert are the only people qualified
to make that determination. Any other testimony is worthless, including my own,
I am not a forensic pathologist or a blood chemistry expert.
If
the person reading this is also not a forensic pathologist or a blood chemistry
expert, your testimony is also worthless. (At least in a court of law
authenticity type setting) Holds zero weight. Unless one has seen the Shroud of
Turin up close and examined it and is a forensic pathologist or a blood
chemistry expert you would never be put on the stand. Because a jury could care
less about your opinion, it means nothing. That holds true for me as well, I
would not be put on the stand. I don't have the proper credentials. Although I
have seen the Shroud of Turin, the whole 14' cloth up close and personal. I am
not a forensic pathologist. So I would not be called to testify.
In a court of law authenticity type setting
the only testimony that would sway A jury one way or the other would come from
1.
Someone who personally examined the Shroud of Turin and has seen the whole 14'
cloth in person and
2.
Is a blood chemistry expert or forensic pathologist. 95% if not 100% of the
weight of the scale which determines the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin
rests on the final report and conclusions drawn by the forensic pathologists
and blood chemistry experts. That was done. It tipped all the way over to 100%
AUTHENTIC!!!
Here they are.
1.
Dr. Frederick Zugibe, Forensic pathologist, Chief Medical Examiner of Rockland
county New York for 33 years. PHD IN ANATOMY. A EXPERT WITNESS Involved in over
10,000 autopsies.
HIS
CONCLUSION: SHROUD IS AUTHENTIC
HIS
FAMOUS QUOTE. I HAVE NO DOUBT IN MY MIND WHAT SO EVER.
In other words he is 100% convinced without a
flicker of doubt in his mind. If you believe the Shroud is authentic, you are
in good company, you are in agreement with a expert forensic pathologist who
actually saw the Shroud of Turin and examined it over a course of years, note I
said years, not days or months, YEARS.
(there are some idiotic moronic skeptics in
disagreement with him, bear in mind none of them have seen the Shroud of Turin
and none of them are forensic pathologists)
2.
Dr Pierre Barbet: Chief Surgeon St Josephs Hospital, Paris France Battle field
Surgeon
HIS CONCLUSION; SHROUD IS AUTHENTIC
Wrote
a book after his examination was complete called Doctor at Calvary.
3.
Dr. Robert Bucklin Professor of Forensic Pathology Involved in over 25,000
autopsies, considered one of the worlds leading experts in forensic pathology
HIS CONCLUSION SHROUD IS AUTHENTIC
HIS FAMOUS QUOTE INDISPUTABLE
4. Dr. Alan Adler: Blood Chemistry Expert
HIS
CONCLUSION SHROUD IS AUTHENTIC
NOTE; HE PERFORMED OVER A DOZEN TESTS ON THE
BLOOD ON THE SHROUD AND PROVED IT TO BE GENUINE BLOOD,, ACCEPTABLE EVIDENCE IN
A COURT OF LAW
5.
Dr. John Heller; Blood Chemistry Expert HIS CONCLUSION SHROUD IS AUTHENTIC,
BLOOD IS TYPE AB, ELEVATED LEVELS OF BILIRUBIN, TESTED POSITIVE FOR HUMAN
ALBUMIN, BILE PIGMENTS AND PROTEIN.
6.
Dr. Baima Ballone: Forensic pathologist and blood chemistry expert
HIS
CONCLUSION SHROUD IS AUTHENTIC
Note:
He also did tests on the Sudarium of Oviedo and found myrrh and aloes in the
blood By anti body antigen testing. Sudarium and Shroud have the same blood.
7.
Dr. Max Frei: Head of the Forensic Science Police Department. Swiss
Criminologist Took pollen samples from Shroud in 1973 and did a thorough
examination. Saw the Shroud of Turin in person and examined it. Went to the
Holy Land to identify pollens on the Shroud that were not in his records or
books.
HIS
FAMOUS QUOTE
I
CAN AFFIRM WITHOUT FEAR OF BEING PROVEN WRONG THIS CLOTH DATES BACK TO
PALESTINE 2000 YEARS AGO Dr. Max Frei
NOTE;
DR.
MAX FREI FOUND POLLENS ON THE SHROUD THAT HAVE BEEN EXTINCT SINCE THE EARLY
CENTURIES.
SO MUCH FOR THE CARBON DATING NON SENSE.
SKEPTICS
DON'T LIKE THIS KIND OF INFO, BECAUSE IT DESTROYS THEM.
IN
A COURT OF LAW TYPE SETTING THE SKEPTICS COULD NOT PRODUCE ONE WITNESS TO TAKE
THE STAND AGAINST THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE SHROUD, THEIR STRATEGY AND
"PROOF" the Shroud is not authentic IS ALWAYS REDUCED TO CHARACTER
ASSASSINATION because they don't have any evidence.
READ THE COMMENTS AFTER THIS POST. You will
see that I am right.
SHROUD
IS AUTHENTIC, That comes from Forensic pathologists and blood chemistry
experts. In a higher court type setting Shroud would be proven to be authentic
beyond a reasonable doubt.
