Join us as we visit The Westminster Abbey and see Sir Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin's grave and look at The missing link.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AWestminster-Abbey.JPG

By Σπάρτακος (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

In this weeks article:

Our trip to Westminster Abbey

Sir Isaac Newton’s grave.

Charles Darwin’s grave.

My Short explanation on the missing link.

Are Atheist Professors clever?

Short description of Westminster Abbey.

My short debate with Trinitarian Reverend Mark Laine Smith, a Duty Chaplin at Westminster Abbey where my wife Emma discovered contradictions in the TRINITY faith.

A while back we went to Sir Isaac Newton’s home and town, followed by a trip last week to the famous Westminster Abbey in central London where my wife Emma and I decided to finish off following Sir Isaac Newton to his resting place.

 Sir Isaac Newton’s memorial above his grave.

Photos by

http://www.westminster-abbey.org/visit-us/picture-gallery

Our main interest was to visit Sir Isaac Newton’s grave 

 Sir Isaac Newton’s memorial above his grave.

Photos by

http://www.westminster-abbey.org/visit-us/picture-gallery

And as we were there we looked for the main promoter of evolution who is Charles Darwin.

I am so excited to report to you this amazing find my wife made which became more interesting then seeing Sir Isaac Newton’s grave.

Because we met a Reverend Mark who was working in the Westminster Abbey who talks to the visitors there, so I talked to him about his Trinity faith and while Emma was listening she made a new discovery about the Trinity faith.

Please read on, as I will do my best to explain what Emma discovered shortly.

First I would like to share our photos and take you on a trip to experience one of the most popular tourist sites in London, the famous Westminster Abbey.

Now the big problem is photos are prohibited in the Abbey which is a real shame, and I was nearly kicked out of the Abbey for taking these photos of me below standing on the head of Sir Isaac Newton’s grave and Charles Darwin's.

Photo of Simon Brown at Sir Isaac Newton's grave. 

Sir Isaac Newton is actually buried only 3 foot down from my foot I am told. 

And what is interesting is only 18 feet away there lays a person who was completely the opposite in faith; the famous Charles Darwin also buried 3 feet under my feet.

Photo of Simon Brown at Charles Darwin's grave. 

How very interesting to see one of history’s greatest genius, English physicist and mathematician Sir Isaac Newton who believed in creation by God, described in his own day as a "natural philosopher" who is widely recognised as one of the most influential scientists of all time and as a key figure in the scientific revolution. 

Although the laws of motion and universal gravitation became Newton's best-known discoveries, he warned against using them to view the Universe as a mere machine, as if akin to a great clock. He said, "Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion. God governs all things and knows all that is or can be done. Reff: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Yet it’s puzzling to understand why most of the world’s population refuse to believe Sir Isaac Newton, when he was one of the greatest scientists who ever lived, but prefer to believe Charles Darwin who’s only degree was in theology.

He believed our first parents were ape’s which is still today an unproven theory because of the missing link between man and ape still happens to be missing.

Apparently Charles Darwin was a liar when he was a schoolboy who invented gratuitous fibs to his schoolmates and boasted that he could change the colour of flowers by watering them with certain coloured fluids. Ref. THE DARWIN PAPERS.

The missing link.

Atheist scientist even admit and confess the missing link between man and ape is still missing and yet cannot understand a very simple fact, that the link between human and ape revealing transition never existed in the beginning, which is why they cannot find it, yet they are still desperately looking for an impossible, invisible theory to prove their unproven faith, and ignore and refuse to believe the Palaeontologist ''who do not believe in God'' who have proven there is NO evidence for evolution and the evolution theories are not correct.

Are Atheist Professors clever?

How can certain atheist today like Professor Brian Cox be that clever if people like him cannot even work out a simple fact that NO living creature has ever been proved to jump from one species to another.

The fossil record clearly proves the Trilobites have NO ancestors, revealing NO transition, NO transformation, NO adaptation, NO changeover to other organisms or creatures.

The Cambrian explosion in the fossil record. Ancient trilobites fossils in stone. 07-08-13 ©Zheka-Boss. Copyright ©2014 iStockphoto LP. 

We in fact do NOT see any organisms or creatures changing from one state or condition to another called Evolution. All confirmed as a time capsule in the fossil record.

The Cambrian Explosion proved and confirmed by the fossil record that the single-celled organisms have no evidence of changing.

Because it suddenly went from a single-celled organisms and leaped into a full-blown arthropod with a complete body and highly complicated eyes and organs called a Trilobite.

But the evolutionist are still in a state of desperation trying many ways to deceive people from believing it was a mastermind GOD who created every living creature, who have gone to the extreme to fool the world into thinking we are animals, by gluing human skulls to chimpanzee jaws, to painting pig's teeth so they look old and then gluing it to a human skull, and even gluing two fossils together to make us believe birds came from dinosaurs. 

Photo. A nonsense: Chris Stringer holds a reconstruction of Piltdown Man's skull HOAX.

Piltdown Man: A hoaxer still pursued. By Jonathan Amos Science correspondent, BBC News. 

By Jonathan Amos Science correspondent, BBC News

It was a shocker, no doubt about it. The Piltdown Man scandal is arguably the greatest scientific fraud ever perpetrated in the UK.

12-13 © allanswart. Copyright ©2014 iStockphoto LP.

There are more chances of PIGS learning to fly then the chance of EVOLUTION. And yet there are now millions of Christians who also believe in EVOLUTION. 
I wonder if these type of Christians who also believe in EVOLUTION believe GOD is an APE?

Richard Dawkins.

Then there are the atheist like Richard Dawkins who have discovered the unproven theory of evolution is a lucrative business which is just a good way of conning money out of sad people before some do their home work and discover what they were conned into believing was the missing link, is now the found link which turned out to be 100% animal or 100% human and is in fact not a found link but still the missing link and a GREAT FORGERY.

You are welcome to read more of my research: THE SO CALLED ''MISSING LINKS'' TO EVOLUTION. THAT FOOLED THE DUMB SCIENTIST. http://wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-so-called-missing-links-to.html
Or watch my video below.

Short description of Westminster Abbey.

I would like to give you some back ground info about this incredible impressive 

Westminster Abbey.

I was told there is 30300 famous bodies berried there. 

Westminster Abbey is literally a luxurious indoor graveyard for the famous.

The-tomb-of-Elizabeth

Photo by

http://www.westminster-abbey.org/visit-us/picture-gallery

Here’s some info from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Please meet me again shortly where I will explain what my wife Emma discovered and how.

Westminster Abbey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Westminster Abbey, formally titled the Collegiate Church of St Peter at Westminster, is a large, mainly Gothic abbey church in the City of Westminster, London, just to the west of the Palace of Westminster. It is one of the United Kingdom's most notable religious buildings and the traditional place of coronation and burial site for English and, later, British monarchs. Between 1540 and 1556 the abbey had the status of a cathedral. Since 1560, however, the building is no longer an abbey nor a cathedral, having instead the status of a Church of England "Royal Peculiar"—a church responsible directly to the sovereign. The building itself is the original abbey church.

According to a tradition first reported by Sulcard in about 1080, a church was founded at the site (then known as Thorn Ey (Thorn Island)) in the 7th century, at the time of Mellitus, a Bishop of London. Construction of the present church began in 1245, on the orders of King Henry III.[4]

Since 1066, when Harold Godwinson and William the Conqueror were crowned, the coronations of English and British monarchs have been held there.[5][6] There have been at least 16 royal weddings at the abbey since 1100. Two were of reigning monarchs (Henry I and Richard II), although, before 1919, there had been none for some 500 years.[7]

Last weeks article: Why do most Trinitarians believe all the church Fathers believed in the TRINITY?

Last week I did my best to demonstrate how an old Trinitarian friend made claims about the Trinity faith by saying all the church fathers believed in the 

Trinity to which they say to justify what they believe.

But I pointed out when researched properly this turned out to be completely false.

If you missed the article please click here.

This week I am writing about what happen at Westminster Abbey which turned out to be an amazing testimony we were both not expecting that caused my wife Emma to start believing my research on the doctrine of Trinity.

Now it is not a cheap day out to visit Westminster Abbey with just under a 2 hour drive if the traffic is good from our home and if you are lucky to find a park in central London it will cost £13 for just 2 hours and then £20 each for admission into the Abbey.

However my wife is disabled and phoned the Abbey to find out if there were any disabled parking. We were delighted to hear a member of the Abbey say admission for her was free, and it was very unusual but in her case they would let us park in a VIP car park at the Abbey.

When we arrived at the gates they had a VIP entrance card waiting for us so we could park.

As we entered the Westminster Abbey I handed over my £20 entrance fee, to then hear them saying I could also go in for free. 

Was GOD looking down on us?

When Emma my wife and I started looking around in this incredible Westminster Abbey, I lost her, then after a while, when I found her she was talking to a Priest-vicar who we were not expecting to meet and talk too who was such a delightful man who was a Trinitarian, Reverend Mark Laine Smith, a Duty Chaplin at Westminster Abbey.

My short debate with Trinitarian Reverend Mark Laine Smith, a Duty Chaplin at Westminster Abbey.

I then started asking Reverend Mark Laine Smith, what he believed which ended up as a debate on the Trinity.

I asked him did he believe the Trinity doctrine, which is ONE GOD who are THREE persons?

He said NO. 

I said but I am confused because if you go on the many Trinity websites they all say the same and make this point very clear which is the foundations of their Trinity faith that the doctrine of the Trinity defines God as three consubstantial persons.

As my wife was listening to the conversation, he then told me not to go on Trinity websites and not to believe what Trinity websites teach.

I said to him, and then what do you believe if you are a Trinitarian who believes in the Trinity?

He said He believes in ONE GOD who is ONE person, which are Father, son and Holy Spirit.

And NOT in ONE GOD who is THREE persons as the Trinity doctrine defines who are Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

What I heard him say shocked me so much I wondered if I needed to inspect my ears to see if they were blocked up with wax, which could be causing me to hear incorrectly.

So I repeated what he said to me back to him, when he then confirmed my ears were not blocked but working very well.

I said to him, so you do not believe what the Trinity teaches that the doctrine of the Trinity defines GOD as ONE GOD as three consubstantial persons. 

He said NO, he believes all THREE are ONE GOD and ONE person.

Before we continue lets have a look to confirm and check if the Trinity doctrine does teach ONE GOD who is THREE persons as the Trinity doctrine defines.

Here is a Trinitarian web site.

http://www.desiringgod.org/articles/what-is-the-doctrine-of-the-trinity

What is the doctrine of the Trinity?

What does it Mean That God is a Trinity?

The doctrine of the Trinity means that there is one God who eternally exists as three distinct Persons - the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Stated differently, God is one in essence and three in person. These definitions express three crucial truths: (1) The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct Persons, (2) EACH PERSON IS FULLY GOD, (3) there is only one God

.

Now lets have a look at a non-biased site like wikipedia.org.

The Christian doctrine of the Trinity (from Latin trinitas "triad", from trinus "threefold") defines God as three consubstantial persons or hypostases-the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit-as "one God in three Divine Persons". The three persons are DISTINCT, yet are one " Substance, essence or nature".

TRINITY https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity

As we can see the main sites above make this very clear: The doctrine of the Trinity means that there is one God who eternally exists as three distinct Persons.

As Emma was listing, she than finally remembered what I have been saying right from the beginning of my research, that Trinitarians often contradict people of their own faith.

Emma finally discovered I was right, that the Trinity faith is full of black holes and contradictions who cannot agree on what they believe who contradict people of their own faith and often do not even understand what they believe.

I said to Mark why do you claim to follow Jesus and yet make Him the ONE TRUE GOD when He Himself said His Father GOD was the only ONE TRUE GOD and excluded Himself from being the ONE TRUE GOD, in John 17:3?

Mark told me that He believed Jesus did not even know Himself who He was.

That’s another new Trinitarian doctrine I have never heard.

I then asked Mark, ok please tell me did Jesus always exist?

He said yes of course.

I then said why do you Trinitarians always ignore what Colossians 1:15 teaches? Saying: He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.

I said: This one scripture proves Jesus was BORN FIRST and before all creation, which alone proves the Trinity false.

He then went silent.

My last question to Mark.

Have you ever done any research on your Trinity faith to see where the Trinity was established from and read about the fact that the Trinity was not a doctrine until 300 years after Christ where the first Trinitarians did not destroy paganism, but instead adopted it at the: First Council of Nicaea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea#Nicene_Creed
This brought our debate to an end, as Mark was offended and suddenly vanished.

Thus says the LORD: “Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the LORD. 

 Jeremiah 17:5

At this point I made a new discovery, discovering THREE new Trinitarian doctrines.

I. Jesus did not know Himself who He was, according to Mark.

2. The first time ever I discovered a Trinitarian who does not believe what the Trinity doctrine teachers that GOD is NOT three PERSONS, but instead the THREE persons are ONE person and ONE GOD.

3. Mark told me I am NOT to believe what other Trinitarians teach but to believe him who is a Trinitarian who does not believe what the Trinity teachers teach.

We are always learning.

What I already knew.

1. Before I met Mark I already believed to not believe what ANY Trinitarians believe and teach. But I have never heard Trinitarians confess this themselves.

2. Before I met Mark I already new from my long research that this is often the case and the evidence that Trinitarians contradict each other.
A tree is known by it's fruit said Jesus. As a faith is known by his works.

Conclusion.

In last weeks article, I hopefully pointed out how certain Trinitarian teachers do not research their faith properly to discover if the foundations of their Trinity faith is rock solid.

This week I have pointed out how the Trinitarians contradict their own faith and cannot agree on what they believe, and often do not understand what they believe.

And yet we are also told by Trinitarians they are filled with the Holy Spirit who teaches them the truth, and yet Trinitarian Mark who has been to university most of his life training and teaching on the Trinity states not to believe other Trinitarians because they do not teach and know the truth of the Trinity.

As we see here, this again is a perfect example revealing how very easy it is to understand Trinitarians do not agree or understand with what they themselves believe and understand who clearly contradict each other.

If you are planning to go to Westminster Abbey, ask for Reverend Mark Laine Smith.

It is interesting to know that within our debate I asked Mark did he read the research by Sir Isaac Newton as you walk over his grave countless times daily? He told me he was not aware of Sir Isaac Newton teachings on the Trinity where he believed it was a great hoax by the first Trinitarians in the fourth century.

And as I had pointed this out to him he promised me he would read the research by Sir Isaac Newton on the Trinity.

So if you find Reverend Mark Lane Smith, at Westminster Abbey? Please do ask him, did you read the research by Sir Isaac Newton on the Trinity that you promised Simon Brown you would do?

Please let me know what he says to you.

I am absolutely flabbergasted to how and why millions of Trinitarians believe and follow the Trinity doctoring and very clearly demonstrate by their own confession how they cannot agree on what they believe, neither understand what they believe, neither can they prove what they believe, which is why the Trinity faith are forced to say: THE TRINITY IS A MYSTERY, to justify their false doctrine.

I wonder who’s worse?

1. Atheist who say GOD does not exist?

2. Or Trinitarians who believe in a Trinity GOD that does not exist?

Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no salvation.

 Psalm 146:3

Please may I leave you with some quotes from Newton on the Trinity. 

Portrait of Isaac Newton (1642-1727). /Photographer http://www.newton.cam.ac.uk/art/portrait.html. Artist Sir Godfrey Kneller (1646–1723)

Click on image above to read about Sir Isaac Newton And Albert Einstein Faith in God.

Was one of history’s greatest scientists, Sir Isaac Newton correct in saying; Trinitarians were mistaken and misguided in its true interpretation of Christianity?

Here is Newton's list:-
1. The word God is nowhere in the scriptures used to signify more than one of the three persons at once.
2. The word God put absolutely without restriction to the Son or Holy Ghost doth always signify the Father from one end of the scriptures to the other.
3. Whenever it is said in the scriptures that there is but one God, it is meant the Father.
4. When, after some heretics had taken Christ for a mere man and others for the supreme God, St John in his Gospel endeavoured to state his nature so that men might have from thence a right apprehension of him and avoid those heresies and to that end calls him the word or logos: we must suppose that he intended that term in the sense that it was taken in the world before he used it when in like manner applied to an intelligent being. For if the Apostles had not used words as they found them how could they expect to have been rightly understood. Now the term logos before St John wrote, was generally used in the sense of the Platonists, when applied to an intelligent being and the Arians understood it in the same sense, and therefore theirs is the true sense of St John.
5. The Son in several places confesseth his dependence on the will of the Father.
6. The Son confesseth the Father greater, then calls him his God etc.
7. The Son acknowledgeth the original prescience of all future things to be in the Father only.
8. There is nowhere mention of a human soul in our Saviour besides the word, by the meditation of which the word should be incarnate. But the word itself was made flesh and took upon him the form of a servant.
9. It was the son of God which He sent into the world and not a human soul that suffered for us. If there had been such a human soul in our Saviour, it would have been a thing of too great consequence to have been wholly omitted by the Apostles.
10. It is a proper epithet of the Father to be called almighty. For by God almighty we always understand the Father. Yet this is not to limit the power of the Son. For he doth whatsoever he seeth the Father do; but to acknowledge that all power is originally in the Father and that the Son hath power in him but what he derives fro the Father, for he professes that of himself he can do nothing.
11. The Son in all things submits his will to the will of the Father, which could be unreasonable if he were equal to the Father.
12. The union between him and the Father he interprets to be like that of the saints with one another. That is in agreement of will and counsel.

The latest missing link has now been DISCOVERED. Tiktaalik.

Description

English: Giant Mudskippers, (Periophthalmodon schlosseri)

Deutsch: Schlosser, (Periophthalmodon schlosseri)

Date June 2006, Photo in one of the Tributaries of the Mekong

Source Photo by Bernhard Luth, Gross a. Sihlsee

Author Bernhard Luth

Permission

(Reusing this file)

OTRS Ticket#: 2006070610008931

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATiktaalik_BW.jpg. By Nobu Tamura (http://spinops.blogspot.com) (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) or CC BY 2.5 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5)], via Wikimedia Commons.

The latest missing link has now been DISCOVERED.  Tiktaalik. What is the Tiktaalik? Tiktaalik /tɪkˈtɑːlɨk/ is a monospecific genus of extinctsarcopterygian (lobe-finned fish) from the late Devonianperiod, about 360 Mya, with many features akin to those of tetrapods (four-legged animals).[1] Tiktaalik may be representative of the evolutionary transition from fish to amphibians. It is an example from several lines of ancient sarcopterygian fish developing adaptations to the oxygen-poor shallow-water habitats of its time, which led to the evolution of tetrapods.[2] It and similar animals may be the common ancestors of a wide swathe of all terrestrial fauna: amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.[3] The first well-preserved Tiktaalik fossils were found in 2004 on Ellesmere Island in Nunavut, Canada. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiktaalik Now The Truth. DID YOU KNOW? The worlds greatest Palaeontologist, that is, the one's who are telling the truth. CANNOT find one single ''missing link'' or ancestor to any living creature? Fact. The fact is there are massive gaps between every creature and animal, with NO evidence of transition proving evolution. As we read above. The Darwinian Evolutionist have been telling people the Tiktaalik is a transitional fossil. But yet again like all other so called missing links, it turn's out to all be a deceiving, false hoax. You can join our friendly debate by clicking on the photo below. Or my Google+ HERE https://plus.google.com/112339660868891799211/posts And reading the truth: Is There Valid and True Evidence to Support Natural Selection Proving Evolution? Plus a great article by Casey Luskin, EVOLUTION NEWS & VIEWS: For Darwinian Evolution, It's One Step Forward, Acknowledging Two Steps Back: Taking A Look at Tiktaalik. I look forward to reading your comments. I am Simon Brown.                                                          Web site.                                                            WWW.REALDISCOVERIES.INFO

UNBELIEVERS, UNBELIEF, BIBLE EVIDENCE & CLAY TABLETS.

UNBELIEVERS, UNBELIEF, BIBLE EVIDENCE & CLAY TABLETS. By Simon Brown Hello friends, may God bless you all. I am continuing on from my last article when our brother in Christ Roland J. Bell B.A. Hons; BBI Dip.  went to a lot of time by putting together the video: Analysis of Brimstone from Sodom & Gomorrah. Even though The Bible says, "Blessed are those who have not seen, yet hath believed." Jesus also said:Seek and you will find. Matthew 7:8. And when we do seek with an open heart and accept Jesus, we most certainly do see, understand and find. Just as Jesus said: Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. Matthew 13:12. Because unbelievers/sinners choose sin, they choose Satan as their God, without realising the everlasting danger to their own souls. So when Satan whispers lies, deception and temptation in the unbelievers ears, they believe it, and think it is just themselves thinking and being clever, and sadly in the end condemning their own souls. But because of your stubbornness (NONE Believers) and your unrepentant heart, (REBELLIOUS heart) you are storing up wrath against yourself (condemning their own soul) for the day of God's wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed. Romans 2 - 5.  Unbelievers cannot understand. Jesus was nailed to a cross to set ALL FREE and grant ALL eternal life. All they are doing by rejecting Jesus is condemning their own souls, and refusing to accept the FREE gift of everlasting life just about to come. A man reaps what he sows. Galatians 6 - 7. Jesus said Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you. Matthew 7 - 7. KJV. But because unbelievers do not believe or know Jesus, unbelievers will not believe or know the truth. Unbelievers do not have God's Holy Spirit as the born again have to teach and correct them with the truth. And there for cannot understand it is our enemy Satan who is the one deceiving them, and do not realise it is The thief (Satan) cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I (Jesus) am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. John 10:10. This theme of rebelliousness and spiritual blindness has exploded all the way down through the generations to extraordinary, outstanding, unprecedented levels. Unbelievers continually send me comments every day. And their most popular comments always seem to say: there is no evidence to support the Bible. Have you ever read the ''shocking'' comments on the you tube channels? HERE. I find them mind blowing to read most of them saying there is no Bible evidence and they do not believe one single Bible discovery, Bible prophecy or anything that supports the facts of The Bible. I tell all unbelievers the same. The Facts Remain. I send them the truth, the evidence and the facts. ARCHAEOLOGY PROVES THE BIBLE. We have ''STAGGERING EVIDENCE'' of 100's of Bible discoveries that proves the facts that prove the Holy Bible. This ''STAGGERING EVIDENCE'' of The Holy Bible is supported by literally 100's of Scientist, archaeologist, Professors, historians, Doctors, experts and researchers who have confirmed the 100's of Bible discoveries and the 1000's of Bible prophecies fulfilled, proving the accuracy of the Bible which prove historical facts. Here is a recent comment: Truth is what can be tested. What you have is faith, not truth as you believe without evidence. So God decides who he gives the truth to yet we are given the freedom to choose? If that's the case then your entire argument breaks down and quoting scripture proves nothing. "UNBELIEVERS" do not believe because there is not enough evidence to believe.  So I send them 100's of facts and Bible discoveries, yet 99% of unbelievers refuse to believe anything. This person then said: Nope not one of them provides a single scrap of credible evidence that your god even exists simon!!! Do you have one single scrap of credible evidence of the god you claim? Just one? Just one solitary scrap of credible evidence?  As unbelievers continually ask and demand evidence of the Bible, I refuse to turn my back on them. We are the light of the world, which cannot shine and give its light, unless it goes into the dark, so it can shine as bright as a light. Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven. Matthew 5:14 - 16. I again and again continue to send unbelievers many more archaeological finds like the many clay tablets with parts of the Bible preserved in rock solid clay written before the Bible and confirming the Bible as historical fact. Last week we looked at the: Analysis of Brimstone from Sodom & Gomorrah by Roland. So lets look at one of the most famous Clay Tablets  called The Ebla tablets regarding Sodom & Gomorrah written before the Bible, yet confirming the Bible.   http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AEbla_clay_tablet.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Ebla_clay_tablet.jpg A clay tablet found in Ebla, Syria. Whilst excavating the ruins of a royal palace in Elba, Syria, in 1975, Mathiae discovered a royal library consisting of 1700 clay tablets. The tablets were inscribed in Eblaic and Sumerian and relate to the Eblan civilization. On translation, they proved to be the earliest records of olive trees, religion, economics, marriages, politics and poetry. One of the tablets names Birsha as the king of Gomorrah, just as the Bible states. It also mentions the five cities in the same order. The tablets are in the Aleppo museum and the National Museum of Damascus, where they are still being deciphered. The five cities on the edge of the Dead Sea were known as the cities of the plain: "and the borders of Canaan reached from Sidon towards Gerae as far as Gaza, and then towards Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboin as far as Lashe" (Genesis 10:19). Note here that Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboin were all mentioned together. The tablets tell the same story, and we know the names of the kings from Genesis 14:2: "other kings went to war against Bera king of Sodom, Birshe king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, Shemeber king of Zeboim and the king of Bela (that is Zoar)". Lot said to the angel of the Lord (Genesis 19:20), "Look, here is a town near enough to run to. It is small and my life will be spared." The angel said, "I will not overthrow the town you speak of, but go quickly for I can do nothing until you reach it." And that is why the place is called Zoar, and a place called New Zoar still exists today. I believe the many clay tablets are amazing and great evidence proving, confirming the stories of the Bible. Because clay tablets were often made and written before the Bible, and are evidence of the Bible in rock solid clay. Clearly preserved by all cultures for us today. Proving they themselves not only knew about them and believed the stories within them, but wanted us to see and know about the secrets of God 1000's of generations later. The Christian faith is certainly not a blind faith. It is a faith, but just as great, a faith that also has rock solid evidence and facts that prove the Bible as historical fact. And excellent for the many doubting Thomases, that is, the ones with open hearts. Sadly it seems to make no difference what evidence unbelievers see or read no matter how good the evidence is. If their hearts are closed as this often is the case, because they love sin more than the truth, the evidence of the Bible means and proves nothing. I find 99% of unbelievers are just not willing to walk away from sin and repent, which then stops them from discovering the truth that comes by Jesus. Just as St. Paul has said: But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1 Corinthians 2:14. Sadly nearly all unbelievers are only interested in trying to prove Christians wrong, in hope they can convert Christians to justify their sin and belief. As I wrote in my book: EVOLUTION Blown to Pieces. Evolutionists are not interested in the truth and as I have shown above, will do what they can to stop others from learning the truth. Darwinism's are urged to emancipate their minds from the fetters of dogma. For atheists, no proof of God is good, or enough. Darwinism's have only one mission and only one desire; to disprove God and lead others away from the truth and from God's love and saving power that comes through Jesus Christ. They are clearly blinded with prejudice minds and personal agenda who take no notice of the true evidence that proves the real facts because they are inspired and brainwashed by their own sin and the god of this world-Satan. This person replied by saying: You were asked for credible evidence simon. Why can't you provide any? Does that mean your claim of a god is utter -------? I find by their own confession unbelievers continually demonstrate the accuracy of the Bible. They are simply not interested in the truth of God/Jesus or the Bible. And prove the very words of Jesus when He said: And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19. King James Bible. Jesus was most certainly right in saying: But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear. Matthew 13:16. I am Simon Brown. Join me next week when we look at more rock solid evidence of God's hidden treasures preserved in clay tablets confirming the Bible as historical fact. May God bless you. www.realdiscoveries.info

ALSO READ RELATED ARTICLES.