Simon Brown.

Join me on this journey. Let's seek the truth together! 💡 Proverbs 8:34-36 Blessed is the man who hears me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at my door posts. For whoever finds me finds life, and will obtain favor from Yahweh. But he who sins against me wrongs his own soul. All those who hate me love death.” Psalm 84: 11 For Yahweh God is a sun and a shield. Yahweh will give grace and glory. He withholds no good thing from those who walk blamelessly. 12 Yahweh of Armies, blessed is the man who trusts in you. 1 John 5:5 Now who is the one overcoming the world, except the one believing that Jesus is the Son of God.
Showing posts with label Textual Criticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Textual Criticism. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 September 2026

Quick Facts: 1 John 3:16 — Did the King James Bible Add “Of God”?


Bible study examining whether the King James Version added “of God” to 1 John 3:16 and whether the verse says God laid down His life.

A Bible-study image investigating the King James Version of 1 John 3:16 and its wording “the love of God.” The research compares Greek textual traditions and asks whether the original verse says that God laid down His life or that Jesus Christ laid down His life for us. Research by Simon Brown.

QUICK FACTS: 1 JOHN 3:16 — DID THE KING JAMES BIBLE ADD “OF GOD”?

Does 1 John 3:16 Really Say That God Laid Down His Life for Us?

Research by Simon Brown

wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.com


AN IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE IN 1 JOHN 3:16

There is a striking difference between the King James Version of 1 John 3:16 and most modern translations.

The King James Bible reads:

“Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.”

1 John 3:16 — KJV

Read naturally, this wording can give the impression that:

GOD LAID DOWN HIS LIFE FOR US.

This is especially significant in the debate over whether Jesus is God, because the person who laid down his life for us was unquestionably:

JESUS CHRIST.

But does the Greek text of 1 John 3:16 actually say:

“THE LOVE OF GOD”?

That is where this investigation becomes very interesting.


WHAT DOES THE GREEK TEXT SAY?

Detailed Bible study infographic examining whether “of God” belongs in 1 John 3:16 and comparing the KJV with Greek textual evidence.

A detailed Quick Facts Bible-study infographic investigating the King James Version wording of 1 John 3:16. It compares the KJV with Stephanus 1550, Beza 1598, Elzevir 1624, the Byzantine Majority Text and the modern critical Greek text, examining the textual variant “of God.” The study asks whether John originally wrote “the love of God” or simply “the love,” and examines the biblical distinction between God who sent His Son and Jesus Christ who laid down His life for us. Research by Simon Brown.

Many important Greek textual traditions read:

Ἐν τούτῳ ἐγνώκαμεν τὴν ἀγάπην...

The important words are:

τὴν ἀγάπην

tēn agapēn

Meaning:

“THE LOVE.”

There is no tou theou — “of God” — in this reading.

The Byzantine/Majority Text omits the words.

Stephanus' 1550 Textus Receptus omits them.

Elzevir's 1624 Textus Receptus omits them.

And the modern critical Greek text likewise does not contain them. (Textus Receptus Bibles)

That is extremely important.


BUT THERE IS AN IMPORTANT TEXTUAL VARIANT

In researching this more carefully, we should acknowledge something my original article did not explain.

The words:

τοῦ Θεοῦ

tou theou

“OF GOD”

do appear in Theodore Beza's 1598 Greek New Testament.

Scrivener's later reconstruction of the Greek text underlying the KJV also contains them. (textus-receptus.com)

Therefore, we should not accuse the King James translators of simply inventing the words “of God” and inserting them into the English Bible without any Greek textual basis.

They had a Greek textual tradition available to them that contained those words.

But this leads us to the much more important question:

DO THOSE WORDS BELONG TO THE ORIGINAL TEXT OF 1 JOHN?

That is the real issue.


COMPARE THE GREEK TEXTS

STEPHANUS 1550

Reads essentially:

“BY THIS WE KNOW THE LOVE, BECAUSE HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE FOR US...”

There is no:

“OF GOD.”

BEZA 1598

Reads:

“BY THIS WE KNOW THE LOVE OF GOD, BECAUSE HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE FOR US...”

Beza contains:

τοῦ Θεοῦ — “OF GOD.”

ELZEVIR 1624

Again omits:

“OF GOD.”

BYZANTINE / MAJORITY TEXT

Also omits:

“OF GOD.”

So even within editions belonging to the broad Textus Receptus tradition, there was disagreement over these two Greek words. (Textus Receptus Bibles)

This is not merely a difference between the King James Bible and modern translations.

There was a textual difference among the printed Greek editions themselves.


WHAT DOES THE MANUSCRIPT EVIDENCE SHOW?

The reading “of God” has comparatively weak Greek manuscript support.

Even a source defending the KJV reading acknowledges that the surviving witnesses supporting it are “few and late.” That source nevertheless argues for retaining the words on contextual grounds. (kjvtoday.net)

This distinction is important.

There are really two separate questions:

1. Did the KJV translators have a Greek source containing “of God”?

YES.

Beza's Greek text contained it.

2. Does that prove “of God” was part of John's original text?

NO.

That question has to be decided from the textual evidence.

And the widespread omission of tou theou is precisely why most modern translations do not put “of God” into 1 John 3:16.


COMPARE THE TRANSLATIONS

KING JAMES VERSION

“Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us...”

NEW KING JAMES VERSION

“By this we know love, because He laid down His life for us.”

WORLD ENGLISH BIBLE

“By this we know love, because he laid down his life for us.”

ENGLISH STANDARD VERSION

“By this we know love, that he laid down his life for us...”

BEREAN STANDARD BIBLE

“By this we know what love is: Jesus laid down His life for us...”

The difference is obvious. (Bible Hub)

Most of these translations do not say:

“THE LOVE OF GOD.”

They say:

“LOVE.”


WHO IS THE “HE” WHO LAID DOWN HIS LIFE?

This is one of the easiest questions in the investigation.

Jesus said:

“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.”

John 10:11

Jesus continues:

“Therefore the Father loves me, because I lay down my life, that I may take it again.”

John 10:17

The person who laid down his life was:

JESUS CHRIST.

So 1 John 3:16 is describing the sacrificial love demonstrated when:

JESUS LAID DOWN HIS LIFE FOR US.


GOD SENT HIS SON

John explains this relationship beautifully in the following chapter:

“By this God's love was revealed in us, that God has sent his only born Son into the world that we might live through him.”

1 John 4:9 — WEB

Notice carefully:

GOD SENT.

and:

HIS SON WAS SENT.

John continues:

“In this is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son as the atoning sacrifice for our sins.”

1 John 4:10 — WEB

God demonstrated His love by sending His Son.

His Son Jesus Christ laid down his life for us.


PAUL MAKES THE SAME DISTINCTION

Paul writes:

“But God commends his own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.”

Romans 5:8 — WEB

Notice Paul's language:

GOD SHOWED HIS LOVE.

How?

CHRIST DIED FOR US.

Interestingly, Beza himself apparently connected 1 John 3:16 with Romans 5:8. (kjvtoday.net)

But Romans 5:8 actually preserves a very clear distinction:

GOD

and:

CHRIST WHO DIED.

Therefore, even the expression “love of God” does not necessarily mean that the following pronoun must identify God as the person who died.

That grammatical point should be acknowledged.

Nevertheless, the textual question remains:

DID JOHN ACTUALLY WRITE “OF GOD” IN 1 JOHN 3:16?

The evidence gives us good reason to question that reading.


GOD RAISED JESUS FROM THE DEAD

Peter preached:

“This Jesus God raised up, to which we all are witnesses.”

Acts 2:32 — WEB

And again:

“The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom you killed, hanging him on a tree.”

Acts 5:30 — WEB

The apostolic distinction is straightforward:

JESUS DIED.

GOD RAISED JESUS.

This is why I believe translations should be particularly careful not to introduce wording that can obscure that distinction.


DOES THIS PROVE THE KJV TRANSLATORS WERE DELIBERATELY PROMOTING THE TRINITY?

NO — AND I WANT TO BE PRECISE ABOUT THIS.

My objection is to the reading, not an accusation that I can prove the motives of the King James translators.

Because Beza's 1598 Greek text contains tou theou, there was a textual basis available to the translators for “of God.”

Therefore I cannot legitimately claim:

“The KJV translators knowingly invented these words to deceive Christians into believing Jesus is God.”

The historical evidence presented here does not prove that.

What I can say is:

I BELIEVE “OF GOD” IS NOT THE ORIGINAL READING OF 1 JOHN 3:16.

And because the KJV includes those words, I believe its rendering at this point gives readers a misleading wording compared with the better-attested shorter reading.

That is a textual argument we can actually investigate.


AN IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION ABOUT MY ORIGINAL ARTICLE

My original article also included a section criticizing KJV Onlyism and discussing Erasmus, the Apocrypha, Pope Leo X and other historical matters.

I want to make something very clear:

THOSE CLAIMS DID NOT ORIGINATE WITH ME.

I was quoting material published by Evangelical Outreach in an article titled:

“KJV ONLYISM IS NOT GOOD.”

The article states, among other things, that the 1611 KJV included the Apocrypha; that Erasmus was a Roman Catholic priest; that he dedicated his Greek New Testament to Pope Leo X; and it makes additional claims concerning Erasmus, his manuscripts and his statements concerning Mary. (Evangelical Outreach)

These were:

CLAIMS MADE BY THE AUTHOR OF THAT ARTICLE,

not historical claims that originated from my own research.

This distinction matters.


AND THERE IS ANOTHER IMPORTANT POINT

The source I quoted is itself written from an evangelical Christian perspective that accepts Trinitarian Christianity.

Therefore, I was not quoting an anti-Trinitarian source attacking the KJV because of the Trinity.

I was showing that criticism of KJV Onlyism also comes from Christians who themselves accept traditional Trinitarian theology.

That makes the quotation relevant historically to my old article.

However:

THIS PRESENT ARTICLE IS NOT AN INVESTIGATION OF ERASMUS.

Nor is it an investigation of every criticism that Evangelical Outreach makes concerning the King James Bible.

Those claims deserve to be examined separately.


A FUTURE INVESTIGATION

Rather than simply repeating those claims, I intend to investigate them individually in a separate article.

We can ask:

Did the original 1611 KJV contain the Apocrypha?

What exactly was Erasmus' relationship with the Roman Catholic Church?

Why did he dedicate his Greek New Testament to Pope Leo X?

Which Greek manuscripts did Erasmus actually use?

What happened with the final verses of Revelation?

What did Erasmus really write about Mary, and what was the context?

How much did Erasmus, Stephanus and Beza actually influence the Greek textual tradition behind the KJV?

Those are historical questions.

They deserve documentation from primary and scholarly sources rather than being assumed true merely because another Christian writer says so.

That will make an excellent separate investigation.


BUT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT 1 JOHN 3:16

And here the evidence is much more focused.

The KJV reads:

“THE LOVE OF GOD.”

Beza 1598 contains:

τοῦ Θεοῦ — “OF GOD.”

But Stephanus 1550 omits it.

Elzevir 1624 omits it.

The Byzantine/Majority Text omits it.

And the modern critical Greek text omits it. (Textus Receptus Bibles)

Therefore the issue cannot simply be dismissed as:

“Modern Bibles removed the words.”

The disagreement existed within the Greek textual tradition itself.


SO WHAT DID JOHN MOST LIKELY WRITE?

The shorter reading gives us:

“By this we know love, because he laid down his life for us...”

The identity of the one who laid down his life is:

JESUS CHRIST.

God:

SENT HIS SON.

Jesus:

LAID DOWN HIS LIFE.

And God:

RAISED JESUS FROM THE DEAD.

That distinction appears repeatedly throughout the New Testament.


CONCLUSION

I believe the King James Version contains a textually questionable reading in 1 John 3:16 when it says:

“THE LOVE OF GOD.”

I would therefore not use the KJV wording as evidence that:

GOD HIMSELF LAID DOWN HIS LIFE.

At the same time, careful research requires me to acknowledge that the KJV translators did not simply invent “of God.”

The words occur in Beza's 1598 Greek text.

The deeper question is whether they were actually written by John.

And when we compare the wider Greek textual evidence, there are strong reasons for accepting the shorter reading:

“BY THIS WE KNOW LOVE, BECAUSE HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE FOR US.”

Who laid down his life?

JESUS CHRIST.

Who sent him?

GOD HIS FATHER.

Who raised him from the dead?

GOD.

And what did John say he wanted us to believe?

“Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.”

John 20:31

That is why this investigation should ultimately be about what John actually wrote, rather than defending one English translation at all costs.


Research by Simon Brown

wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.com

RELATED ARTICLES:

John 1:1

Hebrews 1:10 – Did God Really Say to the Son, “You Laid the Foundation of the Earth”?


Wednesday, 12 August 2026

Quick Facts: Did Jesus Really Say “I Am Alpha and Omega” in Revelation 1:11?

 

Quick Facts infographic examining whether Jesus really said “I am Alpha and Omega” in Revelation 1:11, comparing the KJV, Berean Literal Bible and early Greek manuscript evidence.

A detailed Quick Facts infographic examining the textual evidence for Revelation 1:11. It compares the King James Version with the Berean Literal Bible and highlights commentary and manuscript evidence concerning the disputed words “I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last.”

QUICK FACTS: DID JESUS REALLY SAY “I AM ALPHA AND OMEGA” IN REVELATION 1:11?

PART ONE — WHAT DO THE OLDEST MANUSCRIPTS SAY?

Research by Simon Brown

There is a surprisingly simple textual problem in Revelation 1:11 that every Christian Bible student should know about.

For centuries, readers of the King James Version have read words that appear to have Jesus saying:

“I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last…”

— Revelation 1:11, KJV

This verse has therefore sometimes been used as evidence that Jesus personally declared Himself to be “the Alpha and Omega.”

As the screenshot reproduced in this article demonstrates, some Trinitarian teachers and websites have specifically included Revelation 1:11 among the verses they use to support that claim.

But there is a major problem:

The words “I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last” are absent from important early Greek manuscript witnesses.

That is why these words disappear completely from the Berean Literal Bible and many other modern translations.

So what happened?

Let us look at the Quick Facts.


QUICK FACT 1 — WHAT DOES THE KING JAMES VERSION SAY?

The King James Version reads:

“Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book…”

— Revelation 1:11, KJV

Notice those opening words:

“I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last.”

If these words were part of the original text of Revelation, they would obviously be important.

But now compare the same verse in the Berean Literal Bible:

“Saying, ‘What you see, write in a book and send to the seven churches: to Ephesus, and to Smyrna, and to Pergamum, and to Thyatira, and to Sardis, and to Philadelphia, and to Laodicea.’”

— Revelation 1:11, BLB

Something very important is missing.

The BLB does not say:

“I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last.”

It simply begins:

“What you see, write in a book…”

Why such a dramatic difference?


QUICK FACT 2 — THE DIFFERENCE COMES FROM THE GREEK TEXTUAL EVIDENCE

This is not simply a case of modern translators deciding that they did not like the words.

The longer reading found in the KJV belongs to a later Greek textual tradition.

The clause:

“I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last”

is absent from important early Greek manuscript witnesses and consequently does not appear in the standard critical Greek text followed by many modern Bible translations.

That is why translations such as the Berean Literal Bible, NIV, ESV and NASB do not contain these words in Revelation 1:11.

So the important question is not:

Which English Bible do I personally prefer?

The important question is:

What did the earliest recoverable Greek text of Revelation 1:11 actually say?

According to modern critical textual scholarship, the evidence strongly supports the shorter reading:

“What you see, write in a book…”

without:

“I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last.”


QUICK FACT 3 — WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU TO SIMPLY TAKE OUR WORD FOR IT

This is why the screenshots reproduced in this article are important.

Readers can examine the evidence for themselves.

As shown in the screenshot from the Trinitarian website GotQuestions, their article states:

“Jesus proclaimed Himself to be the ‘Alpha and Omega’ in Revelation 1:8, 11; 21:6; and 22:13.”

Notice particularly:

Revelation 1:11.

It is specifically included as evidence that Jesus proclaimed Himself “the Alpha and Omega.”

But now compare that statement with what recognised Bible commentaries themselves say about the text of Revelation 1:11.


QUICK FACT 4 — EVEN TRINITARIAN BIBLE COMMENTARIES ACKNOWLEDGE THE TEXTUAL PROBLEM

This is not a textual issue invented by people who reject the Trinity.

It has long been recognised by mainstream biblical commentators, including Trinitarian scholars.

The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary states concerning Revelation 1:11:

“The oldest manuscripts all omit this clause.”

What clause?

The very words:

“I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last.”

The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges likewise describes the words “I am … the last” in this location as:

“Not genuine in this place.”

That is extremely important.

On one side, we have Revelation 1:11 being presented as evidence that Jesus proclaimed Himself “the Alpha and Omega.”

On the other side, textual scholarship acknowledges that the very words needed to make that argument are absent from important early manuscript evidence.

That is the textual problem every reader deserves to know about.

Tuesday, 4 August 2026

Acts 20:28 – What Does the Original Greek Really Say?

 

Acts 20:28 Quick Facts infographic examining the original Greek, manuscript evidence, Bible translations, and textual variations in Acts 20:28.

This Quick Facts study explores Acts 20:28 by comparing the original Greek text, Codex Sinaiticus, modern Bible translations, and manuscript evidence. Learn why many translations include footnotes and why careful examination of the text is essential before drawing conclusions.


Acts 20:28 — Quick Facts

Do All Greek Manuscripts Really Say "God Purchased the Church with His Own Blood"?

One of the verses frequently cited in support of the doctrine that Jesus is God is Acts 20:28. But does the manuscript evidence really support that conclusion?

Quick Facts

  • The manuscripts of Acts 20:28 contain textual variations, including readings such as "church of God" and "church of the Lord."

  • Several modern Bible translations include footnotes informing readers that different ancient manuscripts preserve different readings.

  • Some translations also render the verse:

    "the church of God, which he obtained with the blood of his own Son,"
    or include this understanding in the footnotes.

  • The Greek expression τοῦ ἰδίου (tou idiou) literally means "of his own" and can be understood as referring to his own Son, depending on the context.

  • Because of these manuscript differences, many Bible scholars acknowledge that Acts 20:28 is a textually disputed passage.

  • The Codex Sinaiticus contains the reading "God" (Θεοῦ), while other manuscripts contain "Lord." This is one reason why modern translations often include explanatory footnotes.

Why the Footnotes Matter

Before building a doctrine on Acts 20:28, always read the translator's footnotes.

Acts 20:28 Quick Facts infographic examining the original Greek, manuscript evidence, Bible translations, and textual variations in Acts 20:28.

Acts 20:28 Quick Facts infographic examining the original Greek, manuscript evidence, Bible translations, and textual variations in Acts 20:28.

Many readers never notice that Bible translators themselves acknowledge alternative manuscript readings and possible translations.

What Does This Mean?

Acts 20:28 is one of several passages where the manuscript evidence is not entirely uniform. For that reason, the verse should be studied carefully alongside its textual notes, the original Greek, and the wider teaching of Scripture before using it as proof of any doctrine.

"Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica... examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so." — Acts 17:11

Friday, 24 November 2017

1 John 5:7 – The Johannine Comma The Most Famous Textual Variant in the New Testament?

1 John 5:7 – The Johannine Comma  The Most Famous Textual Variant in the New Testament?
Correction: Its absent from 100%

1 John 5:7 – The Johannine Comma

The Most Famous Textual Variant in the New Testament?

By Simon Brown

For centuries, 1 John 5:7 has been one of the most debated verses in the New Testament. The longer reading found in the King James Version states:

"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

This passage has often been used as one of the strongest biblical arguments in support of the doctrine of the Trinity.

But an important question remains:

Did the Apostle John actually write these words?

Or were they added centuries later?

As Christians, we should follow the example of the Bereans.

"Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good."
— 1 Thessalonians 5:21

And as the Apostle John warned:

"Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God."
— 1 John 4:1

If a passage has been questioned by scholars for hundreds of years, it deserves careful examination.


Educational poster explaining the Johannine Comma in 1 John 5:7, comparing the original Greek text with the later added Trinitarian wording and examining the manuscript evidence.

This infographic examines the Johannine Comma found in some versions of 1 John 5:7. It compares the original Greek manuscripts with the later expanded reading and explores the historical, textual, and manuscript evidence behind one of the most famous additions to the New Testament. Discover why many modern Bible translations either omit the passage or place it in a footnote. Read the full research at https://wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.com/

What Is the Johannine Comma?

The disputed words are commonly known as the Johannine Comma.

The longer reading says:

"...in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth..."

Modern Bible translations usually omit these words because most textual scholars conclude they were not part of John's original letter.

Instead, most modern translations simply read:

"For there are three that testify:"

followed by verse 8:

"the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and the three agree."


Why Do Most Modern Bibles Omit the Longer Reading?

One of the main reasons is the manuscript evidence.

The Johannine Comma is absent from the overwhelming majority of ancient Greek manuscripts, including the earliest and most important witnesses.

It is also absent from many early Bible translations, including ancient Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Ethiopic, Arabic and Slavonic manuscripts.

Many respected textual scholars therefore conclude that the longer reading was not part of the original text written by John.

Bruce Metzger, regarded as one of the world's leading New Testament textual critics, concluded that the passage entered the Greek tradition through a marginal note that was later copied into the text.


The Evidence from Greek Manuscripts

The evidence is striking.

The longer Trinitarian wording is missing from virtually all early Greek manuscripts.

It only appears in a handful of very late Greek manuscripts, most of which date from the Middle Ages or later.

This explains why many modern Bible translations omit the passage or place it in a footnote.


The NASB Lexicon

An interesting example is the NASB Greek Lexicon.

When examining 1 John 5:7, the lexicon simply translates:

"For there are three that testify."

The additional Trinitarian wording does not appear because it is absent from the Greek text being translated.


The Interlinear Greek Text

The same pattern can be seen in many Greek interlinear Bibles.

The Greek text simply reads:

"For there are three that testify."

There is no reference to:

  • the Father

  • the Word

  • the Holy Spirit

within the Greek manuscript tradition on which these editions are based.


What Do Bible Commentaries Say?

Even many conservative Bible commentaries acknowledge the textual problem.

The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary notes that the disputed words are absent from the oldest Greek manuscripts and appear to have entered the Latin tradition before eventually finding their way into some Greek copies.

Likewise, the Pulpit Commentary concludes that the passage was almost certainly introduced from a marginal note into the Latin Vulgate before later appearing in a small number of Greek manuscripts.

These observations come from commentators who generally hold orthodox Trinitarian beliefs, yet still recognize the textual evidence.


Dr. James White

Dr. James White is a well-known evangelical scholar and defender of the Trinity.

Despite strongly defending Trinitarian theology, he acknowledges that the longer reading of 1 John 5:7 was not part of the original Greek text.

His acceptance of this conclusion demonstrates that rejecting the Johannine Comma does not require rejecting the doctrine of the Trinity itself. Many Trinitarian scholars also agree that the passage is not original.


Why Was It Included in the King James Bible?

The King James Bible was translated from the Textus Receptus.

The earliest printed editions of the Textus Receptus did not contain the Johannine Comma.

Later editions included it after pressure was placed on Desiderius Erasmus when a Greek manuscript containing the passage was produced. Most scholars believe this manuscript was very late.

Because the King James translators relied largely on these later editions of the Textus Receptus, the longer reading entered the King James Version.


Does Removing the Comma Affect Christian Faith?

For many Christians, the answer is no.

Even many Trinitarian scholars freely admit the passage is almost certainly not original while continuing to believe in the Trinity based on other passages.

Likewise, Christians who reject the doctrine of the Trinity argue that removing the Johannine Comma simply restores John's original words.

Either way, the question is one of textual history, not merely theology.


The Importance of Honest Scholarship

Whatever our theological position, Christians should seek the original words of Scripture.

If later additions entered the biblical text, we should not be afraid to acknowledge them.

Truth has nothing to fear from honest investigation.

As Jesus said:

"Seek, and you shall find."
— Matthew 7:7


My Conclusion

After studying the manuscript evidence, the Greek text, early Bible translations, and the conclusions of numerous textual scholars—including many who themselves believe in the Trinity—I have concluded that the longer reading of 1 John 5:7, known as the Johannine Comma, was not part of John's original letter.

In my view, the evidence strongly supports the shorter reading preserved in the earliest Greek manuscripts.

For me, this demonstrates the importance of testing every teaching against Scripture and carefully examining the historical evidence rather than accepting traditions without question.

Whether readers ultimately agree or disagree with my conclusion, I encourage everyone to study the evidence personally and prayerfully.

As Jesus said:

"Seek, and you will find."
— Matthew 7:7

— Simon Brown


Related articles: